Skip to main content

Relationship between risk markers for cardiovascular disease and peri-implant diseases



The aim of this paper is to explore the serum biochemical parameters also known as risk markers for cardiovascular system, in individuals who have received dental implant treatment, and to reveal risk factors for peri-implant diseases.


The study included 58 subjects with peri-implantitis, 49 subjects with peri-implant mucositis, and 49 healthy subjects. All the subjects were assessed in terms of both peri-implant clinical parameters—probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), the type of prosthesis, gingival index (GI), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), and plaque index (PI)—and serum biochemical parameters (e.g., LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglyceride, total cholesterol, vitamin D, uric acid, white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, hemoglobin (Hb), and platelet counts).


KMW was the lowest in the peri-implantitis group. Compared with the other groups, the peri-implantitis group showed significantly higher levels of triglyceride, uric acid, and WBC. The peri-implantitis group had the lowest level of vitamin D. Triglyceride and uric acid levels had positive correlations with peri-implant clinical parameters.


High levels of triglyceride and uric acid may pose a risk for both peri-implant diseases and cardiovascular diseases. Prior to dental implant surgery, patients’ serum biochemical parameters should be checked.


Currently, dental implants have many applications in the treatment of patients with either partial or complete edentulism. Despite the success of implants and their high survival rate, the prevalence of peri-implant diseases has increased [1]. Infectious peri-implant diseases are classified in two groups, namely, peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. While the former (also known as implant gingivitis) can be defined as a reversible inflammation of the soft tissues embracing an implant, the latter (i.e., periodontitis) is an inflammation leading to loss of supporting bone around an implant [2]. No predictable approach is currently available for treating peri-implant diseases. Hence, preventive measures before the occurrence of any peri-implant disease become crucial. Accordingly, the first steps to establish successful strategies for prevention involve the identification of risk factors [3]. A number of risk factors/indicators may directly increase the likelihood of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis [4]. Potential risk factors for developing peri-implant diseases include smoking, a history of periodontitis, poor oral hygiene, diabetes mellitus, alcohol consumption, genetics, and related factors for prosthetic and implant surface characteristics [5, 6].

Over the years, some papers have focused on the coexistence of medical conditions with peri-implantitis [7,8,9]. Evidence suggests that bone tissues may alter as a result of high levels of triglycerides and cholesterol as well as cardiovascular diseases. An excessive level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (i.e., dyslipidemia) contributes to a poor bone metabolism or osseointegration of dental implants [10]. The mechanisms of the relationship between hyperlipidemia and bone tissue metabolism are related aspects of several metabolic changes, including low bone mineral density, increased osteoclast count, and inhibition of osteoblastic activity [11, 12]. Also, the levels of statins, vitamin D, and cholesterol are closely inter-correlated as well. Interestingly, it is worth to note that 7-dehydrocholesterol is the same precursor of both vitamin D and cholesterol [13]. As far as the bone is concerned, vitamin D has an activating effect on osteoclasts, increasing the amount of extracellular matrix proteins synthesized by osteoblasts [14]. There are several studies in the literature reporting that hypertension, dyslipidemia with high values of LDL and triglyceride, low values of HDL, and vitamin D may pose a risk for peri-implantitis [15,16,17]. Furthermore, altered levels of circulatory lipoproteins with decreased HDL, and increased LDL and triglyceride, indicate a higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases [18]. Also cross-sectional studies have reported that vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased risk of CVD and mortality [19, 20]. Elevations of serum lipids and low serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D may have a serious negative impact on periodontal and cardiovascular health [21,22,23,24].

Thus, it has been reported that elevated serum uric acid levels increase oxidative stress and inflammation [25, 26]. Several studies showed an association between elevated serum uric acid levels and some disorders such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, renal disease, obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia [27]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study in the literature about uric acid levels in patients with peri-implant diseases.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the serum biochemical parameters which are cardiovascular disease risk markers in individuals who have received dental implant treatment and to reveal risk factors for peri-implant diseases.

Materials and methods

The approval was obtained for this cross-sectional study from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University. The study was conducted in compliance with the ethical principles according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

The study included 58 subjects with peri-implantitis, 49 subjects with peri-implant mucositis, and 49 healthy subjects, all of whom comprised patients having visited the Department of Periodontology at the Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University. All participants signed an informed consent.

Diagnosis of peri-implant diseases was performed in compliance with the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions [28].

The diagnostic definition of peri-implant health was based on the following criteria: the absence of clinical signs of inflammation, bleeding, and/or suppuration during gentle probing; and the absence of bone loss on radiography. Criteria for selecting the patients with peri-implant mucositis were as follows: the presence of bleeding and/or suppuration during gentle probing and the absence of bone loss on radiography. Criteria for selecting the patients with peri-implantitis were as follows: the presence of bleeding and/or suppuration during gentle probing and radiographic bone levels of at least 3 mm apical of the most coronal fragment of the intra-osseous part of the implant. The subjects in the study population were required to have at least one dental implant in use for 36 months. The exclusion criteria were as follows: systemic administration of antibiotics (or prophylactic antibiotics) for the last 3 months, pregnancy or breast feeding, having diabetes mellitus, and a history of malignancy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunodeficiency within the last 4 years.

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of peri-implants

All clinical and radiographic examinations were performed by the same person using a typical periodontal probe graded in millimeters (Williams: Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA). The patients were monitored, performing clinical and radiographic examinations on a regular basis. Digital periapical radiographic images were obtained to reveal any threats for diagnostic purposes only.

Records of clinical parameters for the peri-implant were as follows: probing depth (PD) at 6 sites per teeth and implant (the distance between the mucosal margin and the probeable sulcus/pocket), gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), either the presence (1) or absence (0) of bleeding on probing (BOP) at six sites for each implant, and keratinized mucosa width (KMW).

Calibration process conducted by the researcher

The researcher carried out a calibration process in 10 peri-implantitis patients who were not enrolled in the study. Evaluation of the probing pocket depth was performed at intervals of at least 60 min, and the overall value of kappa to calculate the reliability within each examiner was 0.89, representing an acceptable degree of agreement.

Medical examination

Blood samples from the participants were collected after a 12-h period of fasting. Subsequently, we evaluated the levels of HDL and LDL cholesterols, total cholesterol, triglyceride, vitamin D, creatine, urea, and uric acid. We also analyzed the key components in the complete blood count, such as WBC, neutrophil, Hb, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), platelet counts, mean platelet volume (MPV), and plateletcrit (PCT).

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 Statistical Package Software for Windows OS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Power calculations demonstrated that a minimum of 30 samples per group was required to compare data at α = 0.05 with a power value of 85%.

Quantitative variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and median (interquartile range (IQR)). To assess the differences between these groups, we used one-way ANOVA analysis with Bonferroni correction for normally distributed variables, Kruskal Wallis test for variables without normal distribution, and chi-squared test for qualitative variables. ANCOVA was used to compare the three groups in terms of biochemical parameters by adjusting for ages.

The correlations of triglyceride, vitamin D, uric acid, GI, PD, and BOP were assessed using Spearman’s correlation analyses. All the results were deemed statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level.


A total of 156 patients were recruited in the study. The distribution of patients’ age, gender, medical history, implant number, implant position, prosthesis type, and antagonists peri-implant parameters among groups are shown in Table 1. The frequency of smoking and alcohol was not different between the groups (Table 1). The smallest KMW was observed in the peri-implantitis group (p < 0.001).

Table 1 Characteristics of the study groups

Compared with the other groups, the peri-implantitis group showed significantly higher levels of triglyceride and uric acid (Table 2). After age adjustment, the PCT value was significantly higher in the peri-implantitis group (Table 2). The vitamin D value was found the lowest in the peri-implantitis group. WBC value was statistically high in peri-implantitis group, and no significant difference was found between the other parameters in the complete blood count (Table 2). There was a positive correlation between triglyceride values and clinical parameters. Also, there was a positive correlation between uric acid and GI, PD, BOP, KMW values (r = 0.238, p = 0.006; r = 0.464, p ≤ 0.001; r = 0.230, p = 0.008; r = − 0.240, p = 0.006, respectively) (Table 3). Vitamin D had a negative correlation with GI values (r = − 0.191, p = 0.020). There was no significant correlation between PCT values and clinical parameters (Table 3).

Table 2 Biochemical parameters in the study groups
Table 3 Spearman correlation analysis among biochemical and peri-implant parameters


Latest studies have revealed that lipid metabolism may be changed by chronic local and acute systemic infections which are involved in the plasma concentrations of unregulated cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β [29,30,31]. Thus, through action of TNF-α and IL-1β, exposure to microorganisms/endotoxin results in elevated levels of free fatty acids, LDL, and triglyceride [32]. Also, these cytokines play a major role in periodontal destruction too [33, 34]. Recently, some researchers have suggested that hypercholesterolemia may be associated with dental implant osseointegration [35, 36]. It has been hypothesized that there is a relationship between hypercholesterolemia and a higher failure rate of implants and bone grafts, and the authors recommend preventive evaluation of cholesterolemia concentration before implant surgery [10]. It is also known that high LDL and triglyceride values and low HDL are important risk factors for coronary artery disease [37, 38]. Although some studies reported that a history of cardiovascular diseases was associated with peri-implantitis [39, 40], the relationship between peri-implantitis and cardiovascular diseases was not clearly demonstrated. In this study, we investigated the serum biochemical parameters which are cardiovascular disease risk markers in patients with dental implants and possible risk factors in patients with peri-implant diseases.

According to our results, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of LDL-C, HDL-C, and TOTAL-C values; however, the peri-implantitis group had higher levels of triglyceride and uric acid. There was a positive correlation between uric acid, triglyceride, and GI, PD, BOP, and KMW values in our study.

Peri-implantitis and cardiovascular disease may share common risk factors, and association between peri-implantitis and coronary heart disease may be due to the elevated levels of plasma lipids. In a study of Vohra et al. [41], they found a correlation between higher total cholesterol and triglyceride levels and increased risk of peri-implant disease. Alasqah et al. [42] reported that peri-implant indices including PI, BOP, crestal bone loss, and triglycerides as well as levels of low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol were significantly higher in patients with obesity compared with non-obese subjects. Similarly, another study showed a statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss between patients with and without obesity even following an adjustment of metabolic parameters such as total cholesterol and triglyceride [43].

There are several studies which report significant association between plasma lipid levels and the severity of the periodontal disease [44, 45]. In our study, there was a positive correlation between triglyceride values and GI, PD, and BOP values. These results can be explained by the bidirectional relationship between hyperlipidemia and peri-implantitis. Thus, Lachmann et al. [40] has shown a significant comorbidity in individuals with cardiovascular diseases and evidence of implants and with a high prevalence of moderate plaque and BOP. Another study concluded that odds ratio of having peri-implantitis and cardiovascular disease was 8.7 after adjusting for age, smoking status, and gender [39].

Aside from the positive effects of vitamin D on osseointegration in some preclinical studies [46,47,48], it remains unclear whether vitamin D supplementation can effectively accelerate peri-implant bone healing. In our study, vitamin D values were found lowest in peri-implantitis group and also were lower in peri-implant mucositis group than healthy implant group. A retrospective study by Mangano et al. [49] evaluated correlation between early implant failure and low serum levels of vitamin D and showed a higher incidence of the implant failure rate in these patients but a correlation between both factors could not be determined. Furthermore, Acipinar et al. [17] evaluated fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 and 25-hydroxy-vitamin D3 (25(OH) D3) levels in peri-implant sulcus fluid in peri-implant health and diseases. They found that the total amount of 25(OH) D3 was significantly lower in the peri-implantitis group compared with the peri-implant healthy subjects.

In many studies, uric acid has been shown to play an important role in the occurrence and development of coronary artery disease [50,51,52]. Furthermore, uric acid could stimulate inflammatory response [53]. Production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), in human mononuclear cells are stimulated by uric acid [54]. We found that uric acid levels were significantly higher in the peri-implantitis group compared with the other groups. Also, there was a positive correlation between uric acid levels and GI, PD, BOB, and KMW values. Our results support that elevated serum uric acid level may be associated with inflammation too.

After age adjustment, we found that PCT value was significantly higher in the peri-implantitis group, but no significant correlation was found between the PCT values and clinical parameters. In a study by Ustaoğlu et al. [55], PCT and MPV values were found significantly higher in patients with periodontitis, and there was a statistically significant relationship between PCT values and clinical parameters. They concluded that these markers might be a useful marker to determine an increased thrombotic state and inflammatory response in periodontal diseases. Peri-implantitis may also stimulate infectious and immune response and cause the development of atherogenesis, coronary heart disease, and myocardial infarction.

Although previous studies showed a strong association between periodontitis and systemic diseases including cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, the relationship between peri-implantitis and cardiovascular diseases was not clearly demonstrated [56, 57]. Thus, some studies concluded that no statistically significant association between cardiovascular diseases and peri-implantitis were observed [8, 58, 59].

In our study, there were some limitations; coronary angiography was not performed to evaluate coronary artery disease, and radiographic measurement was not done to calculate amount of crestal bone loss around dental implants. Furthermore, the analyses of peri-implant crevicular fluid in patients for the purpose of detecting proinflammatory cytokines may reveal any local destruction around dental implants. The limited sample size is another limitation of this study. Further research with a larger sample size is required to confirm these observations.


In conclusion, we found significantly higher levels of triglyceride and uric acid (i.e., risk markers for a cardiovascular disease) in peri-implantitis group compared with other groups. Long-term clinical trials with larger sample size are required to confirm the relationship between these risk markers and cardiovascular and peri-implant diseases.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Probing depth


Bleeding on probing


Gingival index


Keratinized mucosa width


Plaque index


White blood cell




Mean corpuscular volume


Mean platelet volume




  1. 1.

    Daubert DM, Weinstein BF, Bordin S, Leroux BG, Flemming TF. Prevalence and predictive factors for peri-implant disease and implant failure: a cross-sectional analysis. J Periodontol. 2015;86(3):337–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):286–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Worthington HV. Treatment of peri-implantitis: what interventions are effective? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5(Suppl):S21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Monje A, Insua A, Wang HL. Understanding peri-implantitis as a plaque-associated and site-specific entity: on the local predisposing factors. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2):279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):292–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Elemek E, Almas K. Peri-implantitis: etiology, diagnosis and treatment: an update. N Y State Dent J. 2014;80(1):26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Diabetes and oral implant failure: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2014;93(9):859–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    de Souza JG, Neto AR, Filho GS, Dalago HR, de Souza Junior JM, Bianchini MA. Impact of local and systemic factors on additional peri-implant bone loss. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(5):415–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Krennmair S, Weinlander M, Forstner T, Krennmair G, Stimmelmayr M. Factors affecting peri-implant bone resorption in four implant supported mandibular full-arch restorations: a 3-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(1):92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Choukroun J, Khoury G, Khoury F, Russe P, Testori T, Komiyama Y, et al. Two neglected biologic risk factors in bone grafting and implantology: high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low serum vitamin D. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(1):110–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Luegmayr E, Glantschnig H, Wesolowski GA, Gentile MA, Fisher JE, Rodan GA, et al. Osteoclast formation, survival and morphology are highly dependent on exogenous cholesterol/lipoproteins. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(Suppl 1):S108–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mandal CC. High cholesterol deteriorates bone health: new insights into molecular mechanisms. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015;6:165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Grimes DS. Are statins analogues of vitamin D? Lancet. 2006;368(9529):83–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Christakos S, Dhawan P, Liu Y, Peng X, Porta A. New insights into the mechanisms of vitamin D action. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(4):695–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Papi P, Letizia C, Pilloni A, Petramala L, Saracino V, Rosella D, et al. Peri-implant diseases and metabolic syndrome components: a systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(4):866–75.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Di Murro B, Papi P, Letizia C, Pompa G. The prevalence of peri-implant diseases in patients with metabolic syndrome: a case-control study on an Italian population sample. Minerva Stomatol. 2019;68(4):143–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Acipinar S, Karsiyaka Hendek M, Olgun E, Kisa U. Evaluation of FGF-23 and 25(OH)D3 levels in peri-implant sulcus fluid in peri-implant health and diseases. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(5):1106–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ramasamy I. Recent advances in physiological lipoprotein metabolism. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52(12):1695–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang TJ, Pencina MJ, Booth SL, Jacques PF, Ingelsson E, Lanier K, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2008;117(4):503–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Papandreou D, Hamid Z-T-N. The role of vitamin D in diabetes and cardiovascular disease: an updated review of the literature. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:580474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ljunggren S, Bengtsson T, Karlsson H, Starkhammar Johansson C, Palm E, Nayeri F, et al. Modified lipoproteins in periodontitis: a link to cardiovascular disease? Biosci Rep. 2019;39(3):BSR20181665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nepomuceno R, Pigossi SC, Finoti LS, Orrico SRP, Cirelli JA, Barros SP, et al. Serum lipid levels in patients with periodontal disease: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(12):1192–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Abreu OJ, Tatakis DN, Elias-Boneta AR, López Del Valle L, Hernandez R, Pousa MS, et al. Low vitamin D status strongly associated with periodontitis in Puerto Rican adults. BMC Oral Health. 2016;16(1):89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ketharanathan V, Torgersen GR, Petrovski BÉ, Preus HR. Radiographic alveolar bone level and levels of serum 25-OH-Vitamin D(3) in ethnic Norwegian and Tamil periodontitis patients and their periodontally healthy controls. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ishizaka Y, Yamakado M, Toda A, Tani M, Ishizaka N. Relationship between serum uric acid and serum oxidative stress markers in the Japanese general population. Nephron Clin Pract. 2014;128(1-2):49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Coutinho Tde A, Turner ST, Peyser PA, Bielak LF, Sheedy PF 2nd, Kullo IJ. Associations of serum uric acid with markers of inflammation, metabolic syndrome, and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20(1):83–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chu NF, Wang DJ, Liou SH, Shieh SM. Relationship between hyperuricemia and other cardiovascular disease risk factors among adult males in Taiwan. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16(1):13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S286–s91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fukushima R, Saito H, Taniwaka K, Hiramatsu T, Morioka Y, Muto T, et al. Different roles of IL-1 and TNF on hemodynamics and interorgan amino acid metabolism in awake dogs. Am J Physiol. 1992;262(3 Pt 1):E275–81.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lopes-Virella MF. Interactions between bacterial lipopolysaccharides and serum lipoproteins and their possible role in coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J. 1993;14(Suppl K):118–24.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Van der Poll T, Romijn JA, Endert E, Borm JJ, Büller HR, Sauerwein HP. Tumor necrosis factor mimics the metabolic response to acute infection in healthy humans. Am J Physiol. 1991;261(4 Pt 1):E457–65.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Khovidhunkit W, Kim MS, Memon RA, Shigenaga JK, Moser AH, Feingold KR, et al. Effects of infection and inflammation on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: mechanisms and consequences to the host. J Lipid Res. 2004;45(7):1169–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ataoglu H, Alptekin NO, Haliloglu S, Gursel M, Ataoglu T, Serpek B, et al. Interleukin-1beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels and neutrophil elastase activity in peri-implant crevicular fluid. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13(5):470–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Salameh Z, Almas K, Romanos GE. Proinflammatory cytokines in the crevicular fluid of patients with peri-implantitis. Cytokine. 2011;53(1):8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Keuroghlian A, Barroso AD, Kirikian G, Bezouglaia O, Tintut Y, Tetradis S, et al. The effects of hyperlipidemia on implant osseointegration in the mouse femur. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41(2):e7–e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tirone F, Salzano S, D'Orsi L, Paola P, Rodi D. Is a high level of total cholesterol a risk factor for dental implants or bone grafting failure? A retrospective cohort study on 227 patients. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(1):77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Iuliano L, Mauriello A, Sbarigia E, Spagnoli LG, Violi F. Radiolabeled native low-density lipoprotein injected into patients with carotid stenosis accumulates in macrophages of atherosclerotic plaque: effect of vitamin E supplementation. Circulation. 2000;101(11):1249–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Febbraio M, Hajjar DP, Silverstein RL. CD36: a class B scavenger receptor involved in angiogenesis, atherosclerosis, inflammation, and lipid metabolism. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(6):785–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Renvert S, Aghazadeh A, Hallström H, Persson GR. Factors related to peri-implantitis - a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(4):522–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lachmann S, Stehberger A, Axmann D, Weber H. The peri-implant health in patients attending an annual recall program. A clinical and microbiological study in 74 patients from the Tübingen Implant Registry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(12):1300–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Vohra F, Alkhudhairy F, Al-Kheraif AA, Akram Z, Javed F. Peri-implant parameters and C-reactive protein levels among patients with different obesity levels. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(2):130–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Alasqah MN, Al-Shibani N, Al-Aali KA, Qutub OA, Abduljabbar T, Akram Z. Clinical indices and local levels of inflammatory biomarkers in per-implant health of obese and nonobese individuals. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):80–4.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Alkhudhairy F, Vohra F, Al-Kheraif AA, Akram Z. Comparison of clinical and radiographic peri-implant parameters among obese and non-obese patients: a 5-year study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(5):756–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lösche W, Karapetow F, Pohl A, Pohl C, Kocher T. Plasma lipid and blood glucose levels in patients with destructive periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27(8):537–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Jaramillo A, Lafaurie GI, Millán LV, Ardila CM, Duque A, Novoa C, et al. Association between periodontal disease and plasma levels of cholesterol and triglycerides. Colomb Med (Cali, Colombia). 2013;44(2):80–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Dvorak G, Fugl A, Watzek G, Tangl S, Pokorny P, Gruber R. Impact of dietary vitamin D on osseointegration in the ovariectomized rat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(11):1308–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zhou C, Li Y, Wang X, Shui X, Hu J. 1,25Dihydroxy vitamin D(3) improves titanium implant osseointegration in osteoporotic rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114(5 Suppl):S174–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kelly J, Lin A, Wang CJ, Park S, Nishimura I. Vitamin D and bone physiology: demonstration of vitamin D deficiency in an implant osseointegration rat model. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(6):473–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Mangano F, Mortellaro C, Mangano N, Mangano C. Is low serum vitamin D associated with early dental implant failure? A retrospective evaluation on 1625 implants placed in 822 patients. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:5319718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Galassi FM, Borghi C. A brief history of uric acid: from gout to cardiovascular risk factor. Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26(5):373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kim SY, Guevara JP, Kim KM, Choi HK, Heitjan DF, Albert DA. Hyperuricemia and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62(2):170–80.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Feig DI, Kang DH, Johnson RJ. Uric acid and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1811–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kanellis J, Watanabe S, Li JH, Kang DH, Li P, Nakagawa T, et al. Uric acid stimulates monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production in vascular smooth muscle cells via mitogen-activated protein kinase and cyclooxygenase-2. Hypertension. 2003;41(6):1287–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Johnson RJ, Kang DH, Feig D, Kivlighn S, Kanellis J, Watanabe S, et al. Is there a pathogenetic role for uric acid in hypertension and cardiovascular and renal disease? Hypertension. 2003;41(6):1183–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ustaoglu G, Erdal E, İnanır M. Does periodontitis affect mean platelet volume (MPV) and plateletcrit (PCT) levels in healthy adults? Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020;66(2):133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Slade GD, Ghezzi EM, Heiss G, Beck JD, Riche E, Offenbacher S. Relationship between periodontal disease and C-reactive protein among adults in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(10):1172–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Corlan Puscu D, Ciuluvica RC, Anghel A, Malaescu GD, Ciursas AN, Popa GV, et al. Periodontal disease in diabetic patients - clinical and histopathological aspects. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2016;57(4):1323–9.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Dalago HR, Schuldt Filho G. Risk indicators for peri-implantitis. A cross-sectional study with 916 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(2):144–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Koldsland OC, Scheie AA, Aass AM. The association between selected risk indicators and severity of peri-implantitis using mixed model analyses. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(3):285–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references



Author information




Categories of the authors’ contribution are as follows: concept/design (GU and EE), data collection (GU and EE), data analysis/interpretation (EE), drafting of the article (GU and EE), critical revision of the article (GU and EE), and approval of the article (GU and EE).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gülbahar Ustaoğlu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval was obtained for this cross-sectional study from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University. Written consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Gülbahar Ustaoğlu and Emrah Erdal declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ustaoğlu, G., Erdal, E. Relationship between risk markers for cardiovascular disease and peri-implant diseases. Int J Implant Dent 6, 73 (2020).

Download citation


  • Peri-implantitis
  • Risk factors
  • Triglycerides
  • Uric acid
  • Vitamin D