Skip to main content
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Download PDF

Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma-impregnated polycaprolactone-β tricalcium phosphate bio-scaffold enhanced bone regeneration around dental implants

International Journal of Implant Dentistry volume 7, Article number: 35 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Finding a material that supports bone regeneration is the concern for many investigators. We supposed that a composite scaffold of poly(ε) caprolactone and β-tricalcium phosphate (PCL-TCP) would entail desirable characteristics of biocompatibility, bioresorbability, rigidity, and osteoconductivity for a proper guided bone regeneration. Furthermore, the incorporation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) would boost the bone regeneration. We conducted this study to evaluate the bone regeneration capacity of PCL-TCP scaffold that is loaded with MSCs and PRP.

Materials and methods

Five miniature pigs received 6 implants in 6 created-mandibular bony defects in the right and left lower premolar areas. The bony defects were managed according to the following three groups: the PCL-TCP scaffold loaded with MSCs and PRP (MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP) group (n = 10), PCL-TCP scaffold loaded with PRP (PRP+PCL-TCP) group (n = 10), and PCL-TCP scaffold group (n = 10). After 12 weeks, the bone regeneration was assessed using fluorochrome bone labeling, μCT bone morphogenic analysis, and histomorphometric analysis.

Results

All of the three groups supported the bone regeneration around the dental implants. However, the PCL-TCP scaffold loaded with MSCs and PRP (MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP) group showed non-significant higher bone surface, bone specific surface, and bone surface density than the other two groups as revealed by the μCT bone morphogenic analysis. Histologically, the same group revealed higher bone-implant contact ratio (BIC) (p = 0.017) and new bone height formation (NBH, mm) (p = 0.0097) with statistically significant difference compared to the PCL-TCP scaffold group.

Conclusions

PCL-TCP scaffold is compatible for bone regeneration in bone defects surrounding dental implants. Moreover, the incorporation of MSCs and PRP optimized the bone regeneration process with respect to the rate of scaffold replacement, the height of the regenerated bone, and implant stability.

Background

Achieving proper dental implant stability and survivability has been challenged by the deficiency of the hosting alveolar bone in respect to height, width, and well-maintained bony walls [1]. Autologous bone graft has been the standard approach to reconstruct the alveolar bony defects due to its osseoinductive, osseoconductive, and osteogenic properties. Nevertheless, the high resorption rate of the autologous bone grafts, which could reach 60%, may jeopardize the clinical outcomes [2]. Moreover, the autologous bone graft might be associated with donor site morbidity such as, infection, pain, blood loss, and scarring [3].

Recently, guided bone regeneration has grown immensely. This procedure includes the application of a membrane to exclude non-osteogenic tissue from interfering with bone regeneration. This membrane can be resorbable or non-resorbable and it should have some essential properties like biocompatibility, clinical manageability, and space making ability [4]. Polycaprolactone (PCL)-based scaffolds are characterized by biocompatibility, bioresorbability, and manageability. However, they lack rigidity, stability, and osteoconductive capacity [5]. The incorporation of β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) had enhanced the rigidity and osteoconductivity of PCL based scaffolds [6]. In terms of bone regeneration, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have been reported to boost the bone formation through promoting the osteoblasts formation and vascularization [7,8,9]. Accordingly, we conducted this study to evaluate the bone regeneration capacity of PCL-TCP scaffolds loaded with MSCs+PRP within peri-implant bony defects.

Materials and methods

Study design

The animal studies were performed after receiving approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) in Seoul National University. Five male miniature pigs (SPF Micropig®, PWG Genetics Korea, Ltd., Korea), aged 12.5 to 17.5 months (32.8 to 41.0 kg in weight), were used in this study. Each miniature pig received 6 implants; 3 implants on each side of the inferior bone of the mandible at the premolar area. Buccal bony defects were created after the implant site preparation and before the implants placement. A total of 30 buccal bone defects were equally distributed to 10 bony defects for each of the designed three groups (2 out of 6 defects assigned for each of the three groups in each animal):

  • MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP group. Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma loaded into polycaprolactone - β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold (n = 10)

  • PRP+PCL-TCP group. Platelet-rich plasma loaded into polycaprolactone-β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold (n = 10)

  • PCL-TCP group. Polycaprolactone-β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold (n = 10)

PCL-TCP scaffold fabrication

A composite scaffold of PCL-TCP (80:20%) (Osteopore International Pte. Ltd., Singapore) was fabricated using the fused deposition modeling method that was described in previous reports [10, 11]. The scaffold was designed as honeycomb structure with 0°, 60°, and 120° cross linking; 70% porosity and 0.515 mm average pore size. The scaffold was cut into a half-tube shape with 4-mm inner diameter, 8-mm outer diameter, and 2-mm thickness. This dimension was selected to allow the scaffold to fit around the dental implants promptly (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The PCL-TCP scaffold structure. a Tube-shape scaffold with 4-mm inner diameter, 8-mm outer diameter, 4-mm height, and 2-mm thickness. b The scaffold was cut in half to fit the created buccal mandibular bony defects

Full size image

Human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSCs)

The cells were obtained from the Research Institute of Biotechnology at Dongguk University, Korea. The cells were found positive against CD 73, CD 90, CD 105, and CD 166 markers and negative against CD14, CD 31, and CD 45 markers using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. The cells differentiation abilities were proved by inducing the cells to differentiate into osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes.

The cells were seeded and expanded using low glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (LG-DMEM; Gibco-BRL, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco-BRL, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (PAA laboratories, Germany). Cells medium was changed every 3 days. The cells were harvested at 80% confluency and 5 passages and then loaded into the scaffold of MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP group with cell density of 4 × 107 cells/ml at the day of implantation using a micropipette.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation

PRP preparation and loading took place on the day of operation at the time of the dental implants sites preparation. A total of 200 ml of blood was aspirated and divided into 4 tubes with 50 ml per each. The tubes were already coated with 0.2 gm EDTA as anticoagulant. The PRP preparation conducted in two-steps. The blood was first centrifuged at 3200 rpm for 5 min and the middle buffy coat and part of the plasma were aspirated into new tube where they were centrifuged at 5200 for 5 min. The result lower middle PRP was aspirated and kept into a sample shaker for 30 min at room temperature. Every 50 ml of blood resulted in 1.0~1.5 ml of PRP. Reagents of thrombin and CaCl2 (1:1) (Thrombin, 1000 units, Dirabine® powder, Korea united pharm., Co., Korea) (CaCl2, 100 mg/mL, Calmia® Inj., Korea united pharm., Co., Korea) were mixed with the PRP at 1:6 volume ratio for creating an activated gel form. A 0.2~0.5 ml of that PRP gel was loaded into each scaffold of MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP group and PRP+PCL-TCP group.

Surgical procedure

General anesthesia was induced with an intra-muscular (IM) injection of zoletil and xylazine and maintained with isoflurane inhalation (0.5–2%). The lower face was shaved, swapped with iodine solution, and draped sterile. The mandibular inferior border was incised bilaterally within the borders of the premolar areas (Fig. 2a). Subperiosteal flaps were reflected, the implants sites were prepared in the proper sequence, and half-round bony defects were created buccally with diameter of 8 mm, depth of 2 mm, and height of 4 mm (Fig. 2b). Thereafter, bone-level implants (AvanaⓇ, GSII, Osstem Co., Korea) with a length of 8.5 mm and a diameter of 4.0 mm were inserted and the defects were filled with the customized scaffolds (Fig. 2c, d). The stem cells were seeded into the PCL-TCP scaffold (4.0 × 106 cells/scaffold) by a drop down and soaking method using a micropipette and the prepared PRP was loaded into the scaffold (0.2~0.5 ml/scaffold). The flaps were repositioned and closed in layers. Intra-muscular injections of oxytetracycline 3 ml and flunixin meglumine 2 ml were given for 3 days post-operatively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Intraoperative photographs showing the implants site drilling and placement of the MSCs-PRP-loaded PCL-TCP scaffolds. a Incision was made along the inferior border of the mandible bilaterally within the premolar area. b Three implant sites were drilled with buccal half circle bony defects. c, d The implants were placed and the scaffolds were placed to cover them

Full size image

Post-operative CT scan

Three days after the operation, a mandible CT scan was taken to confirm the implant-scaffold stability and rule out any post-operative complications.

Fluorochrome bone labeling

To observe the histological sequence of bone regeneration, three fluorochromes were intra-muscularly injected at frequent times within 12 weeks post-operatively. Tetracycline HCL 15 mg/kg was administered at 3 and 11 weeks. Calcein (10 mg/kg) and alizarin red (30 mg/kg) fluorochromes were administered at 6 and 9 weeks, respectively. The animals were sacrificed after 12 weeks. The colorful regenerated bands were checked using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus-Flouview300, Olympus Co., Tokyo, Japan). The color filter ranges were red 530–560/580 nm for red alizarin, green 494/517 nm for calcein, and yellow 525–560 nm for tetracycline.

Micro-CT bone morphogenic analysis

Using 5 implant-grafted sites, micro-CT images were obtained using X-ray microtomography system (Skyscan 1072/1172, ver. 1.5, Belgium) under the settings of × 14 magnification, 80 kV/100 mA, 180° rotation, 0.90° rotation step, 3.4-s exposure time, and no filtering. The reference Hounsfield unit (HU) was used to assure optimal digital images with minimal beam hardening effects (0.7000 HU to 0.1000 HU values in 1072 system and 0.1100 HU to 0.0030 HU in 1172 system). The digitalized bitmap image files were analyzed using CTAn® software program (Skyscan Co., Belgium). The region of interest (ROI) was drawn over the implant and scaffold within 0.5 mm lateral to their borders. The 3-D analysis data of the reference PCL-TCP scaffold was 255.12 mm3 in tissue volume (TV) and 240.29 mm2 in bone surface (BS). The new bone formation capacity was analyzed using the morphometric parameters of total tissue volume (TV, mm3), bone volume (BV, mm3), bone volume fraction ratio (BV/TV, %), regenerative new bone surface area (BS, mm2), bone specific surface (BS/BV, mm−1), bone surface density (BS/TV, mm−1), and interception surface (I.S, mm2). Three-dimensional rendered models were obtained using the Vworks® software program (Osstem Co., Korea).

Histomorphometric analysis

Five implant-scaffold non-decalcified bone blacks were embedded in light curing resin (Technovit 7200 VLC+BPO, Kulzer & Co., Germany). They were then cut longitudinally parallel to the long axis of the implants using the Exact Cutting and Grinding Equipment (Exact Apparatebau, Norderstedt, Germany) into 30-μm-thick sections. Thereafter, the samples were stained using hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome (MT) staining. New bone height (NBH, mm), new bone area (NBA, mm2), bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio, and residual scaffold areas (RSA, mm2) were measured in the experimental sites using Kappa Imagebase® (Kappa optoelectronics, Germany) software.

Statistics

All data were presented as mean ± standard error. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Repeated measures ANOVA were used for consecutive comparisons among each of the groups. One way ANOVA was used for multiple comparisons, and post hoc tests were followed by Fisher’s protected least significance difference (PLSD) tests for multiple pair-wise tests using Statview® statistical software (SAS institute Inc., USA).

Results

Gross findings and post-operative CT scan

No animal died due to complications from the surgery or due to anesthetic complications. Additionally, the healing processes for each of the animals were uneventful. A total of 30 implants were placed. Twenty-seven implants survived and 3 implants were found loose with no stability. Each one of these three implants belonged to each of the three individual groups in the same side of the used animal. No other complications like infection or foreign-body rejection were found.

Fluorochrome bone labeling

New bone formation was found between the implant and scaffold in the three groups. However, no separable chronologic regenerative fluorescence bands could be observed in the three groups (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Confocal image showing the polychromic vital staining of Tetracycline HCl (3 and 11 weeks), Calcein (6 weeks), and Alizarin Red stain (9 weeks). No separable chronologic regenerative fluorescence bands could be observed in the three groups. a MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP, b PRP+PCL-TCP, and c PCL-TCP groups (200-μm scale bar)

Full size image

Micro-CT bone morphogenic findings

The regenerative bone volume (BV) and bone volume fraction ratio (BV/TV) were non-significantly higher in the PCL-TCP group and MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP group compared to the PRP+PCL-TCP group. The MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP group showed non-significant higher bone surface (BS), bone surface density (BS/TV), and bone specific surface (BS/BV) than the other two groups (Fig. 4) (Table 1).

Fig. 4
figure 4

3D-rendered structure showing the MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP group (a), the PRP+PCL-TCP group (b), and the PCL-TCP group (c) where more residual scaffold remnants can be observed compared to the other groups

Full size image
Table 1 Micro-CT bone morphogenic findings
Full size table

Histomorphometric findings

The rate of scaffold degradation was slow in the PCL-TCP group and the PRP+PCL-TCP group compared to the MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP group. Altogether, the MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP group revealed higher bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio (p = 0.017) and new bone height (NBH) formation (p = 0.0097) with statistically significant difference in comparison with PCL-TCP group. The new bone area (NBA) was largely formed within the MSCs+PRP+Scaffold group, but with no statistically difference compared to the other groups (Fig. 5) (Table 2).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Histomorphometric analysis. a Parameters of histomorphometric analysis; new bone height (mm, blue line), new bone area (mm2, red polygonal area), bone-implant contact (red/yellow length ratio), and residual scaffold area (mm2, yellow polygonal area). b–d Microphotograph of the histological structure showing new regenerative bone along the implant contact surface with degradation of the scaffold at b MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP, c PRP+PCL-TCP, and d PCL-TCP groups, respectively

Full size image
Table 2 Histomorphometric analysis
Full size table

Discussion

Many resorbable and non-resorbable membranes are used for the purpose of guided bone regeneration. Non-resorbable materials are frequently exposed throughout the soft tissue and need a second operation for removal [12]. Resorbable material like collagen is considered an outstanding biocompatible membrane. However, it lacks rigidity and susceptible to bone dehiscence and fenestration [13]. Polyesters like poly(ε) caprolactone (PCL) are characterized by manageability, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and rigidity. Poly(ε) caprolactone’s (PCL) main disadvantages are hydrophobicity, that lowers its cells affinity, and slow degradation rate, that may interfere with the process of bone regeneration [14, 15]. A controlled biodegradability is critical for providing the space gradually for bone regeneration. In the present study, β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) was incorporated to improve the PCL scaffold stability, osteoconductivity, and increase the degradation rate.

Porosity is another important factor in the process of bone regeneration. Higher porosity is expected to improve bone formation by selectively increasing the diffusion of nutrients, oxygen, and removal of cellular waste products [16]. In this study, the scaffolds were designed with 70% porosity. A previous report showed that PCL/TCP membranes had a slightly higher elastic modulus and promoted the proliferation of pre-osteoblasts and inhibited fibroblast ingrowth in vitro accompanied with significantly higher bone regeneration values than PCL and collagen groups in vivo [17]. A better maintenance of the alveolar contour by PCL-TCP scaffold was also found in comparison with autogenous particulate bone within 6 months [18].

In the present study, the loading of MSCs+PRP into the PCL-TCP scaffold resulted in significant increase of new bone formation (new bone height) and better stability of implant(bone-implant contact ratio) compared to the mere PCL-TCP scaffold. This indicated the important role of MSCs in the guided bone regeneration. The results of the current study go in accordance with previous reports that showed improved bone regeneration after loading MSCs in the scaffolds [19, 20]. The scaffold is acting as a matrix to accommodate the cells to survive and subsequently enhance bone formation. MSCs are believed to enhance osteogenesis through immunosuppression effect. MSCs has the ability to reduce the level of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). TNF-α is known for its role in blockage of differentiation into osteoblasts [21]. In the present study, umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC- MSCs) were used. These types of stem cells possess longer culture period and higher proliferation capacity compared to bone marrow-derived MSCs [8]. MSCs can survive xenotransplantation without immune suppression and proved to be immunosuppressive. In one report, when pigs UC-MSCs were transplanted into rats, they did not stimulate immune rejection and survived for 6 weeks [22].

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) enhanced the bone regeneration and degradation of the scaffold. PRP worked through release of growth factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which is primarily responsible for endothelial cells proliferation in angiogenesis. Angiogenesis or vascularization enhances bone regeneration by accelerating the differentiation and/or maturation of infiltrating osteoblasts and osteoblast precursor cells [7].

Conclusion

The PCL-TCP scaffold proved to be compatible for bone regeneration in bone defects surrounding dental implants. Moreover, the incorporation of MSCs and PRP optimized the bone regeneration process with respect to the rate of scaffold replacement, the height of the regenerated bone, and implant stability.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PCL:

Poly(ε) caprolactone

TCP:

β-tricalcium phosphate

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

PRP:

Platelet-rich plasma

hUCMSCs:

Human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells

TV:

Tissue volume

BS:

Bone surface

BV:

Bone volume

BV/TV:

Bone volume fraction ratio

BS:

Regenerative new bone surface area

BS/BV:

Bone specific surface

BS/TV:

Bone surface density

I.S:

Interception surface

NBH:

New bone height

NBA:

New bone area

BIC:

Bone-implant contact

RSA:

Residual scaffold areas

References

  1. Kulakov AA, Gvetadze RS, Brailovskaya TV, Khar'kova AA, Dzikovitskaya LS. Modern approaches to dental implants placement in deficient alveolar bone. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2017;96(1):43–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Widmark G, Andersson B, Ivanoff CJ. Mandibular bone graft in the anterior maxilla for single-tooth implants. Presentation of surgical method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26(2):106–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80827-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD, Brislin BT, Leland JM, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(2):134–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200301150-00008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karring T, Nyman S, Gottlow J, Laurell L. Development of the biological concept of guided tissue regeneration--animal and human studies. Periodontol 2000. 1993;1(1):26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams JM, Adewunmi A, Schek RM, Flanagan CL, Krebsbach PH, Feinberg SE, Hollister SJ, Das S. Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials. 2005;26(23):4817–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Choong C, Triffitt J, Cui Z. Polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: effects of a calcium phosphate coating layer on osteogenic cells. Food Bioproducts Processing. 2004;82(2):117–25. https://doi.org/10.1205/0960308041614864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marx RE, Carlson ER, Eichstaedt RM, Schimmele SR, Strauss JE, Georgeff KR. Platelet-rich plasma: growth factor enhancement for bone grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85(6):638–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90029-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Kluter H, Bieback K. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells. 2006;24(5):1294–301. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Masuki H, Okudera T, Watanebe T, Suzuki M, Nishiyama K, Okudera H, et al. Growth factor and pro-inflammatory cytokine contents in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF), and concentrated growth factors (CGF). Int J Implant Dentistry. 2016;2(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bilodeau K, Mantovani D. Bioreactors for tissue engineering: focus on mechanical constraints. A comparative review. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(8):2367–83. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.2367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Song K, Liu T, Cui Z, Li X, Ma X. Three-dimensional fabrication of engineered bone with human bio-derived bone scaffolds in a rotating wall vessel bioreactor. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;86(2):323–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):113–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01781.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Calori GM, Giannoudis PV. The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence. BMC Med. 2012;10(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lam CX, Hutmacher DW, Schantz JT, Woodruff MA, Teoh SH. Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;90(3):906–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Domingos M, Intranuovo F, Gloria A, Gristina R, Ambrosio L, Bartolo PJ, et al. Improved osteoblast cell affinity on plasma-modified 3-D extruded PCL scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(4):5997–6005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hing KA. Bioceramic gone braft substitutes: influence of porosity and chemistry. Int J Appl Ceramic Technol. 2005;2(3):184–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2005.02020.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shim JH, Won JY, Park JH, Bae JH, Ahn G, Kim CH, et al. Effects of 3D-printed polycaprolactone/beta-tricalcium phosphate membranes on guided bone regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(5).

  18. Goh BT, Chanchareonsook N, Tideman H, Teoh SH, Chow JK, Jansen JA. The use of a polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate scaffold for bone regeneration of tooth socket facial wall defects and simultaneous immediate dental implant placement in Macaca fascicularis. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(5):1379–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nuntanaranont T, Promboot T, Sutapreyasri S. Effect of expanded bone marrow-derived osteoprogenitor cells seeded into polycaprolactone/tricalcium phosphate scaffolds in new bone regeneration of rabbit mandibular defects. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018;29(3):24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6030-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JW, Chu SG, Kim HT, Choi KY, Oh EJ, Shim J-H, Yun WS, Huh J, Moon S, Kang S, Chung H. Osteogenesis of adipose-derived and bone marrow stem cells with polycaprolactone/tricalcium phosphate and three-dimensional printing technology in a dog model of maxillary bone defects. Polymers. 2017;9(9):450. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090450.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kovach TK, Dighe AS, Lobo PI, Cui Q. Interactions between MSCs and immune cells: implications for bone healing. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:752510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss ML, Mitchell KE, Hix JE, Medicetty S, El-Zarkouny SZ, Grieger D, et al. Transplantation of porcine umbilical cord matrix cells into the rat brain. Exp Neurol. 2003;182(2):288–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00128-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number HI20C2114).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

    Akram Abdo Almansoori, Oh-Jun Kwon, Jeong-Hun Nam & Jong-Ho Lee

  2. Craniofacial Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Akram Abdo Almansoori

  3. Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Dongkuk University, Seoul, Korea

    Young-Kwon Seo

  4. Department of Orthopedics and Dwarfism Clinic, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea

    Hae-Ryong Song

  5. Innovation Research and Support Center for Dental Science, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea

    Jong-Ho Lee

Authors
  1. Akram Abdo Almansoori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oh-Jun Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeong-Hun Nam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Young-Kwon Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hae-Ryong Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jong-Ho Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: J-HL. Methodology/investigation: O-JK, J-HN, H-RS, and Y-KS. Data analysis/interpretation: O-JK and AAA. Writing—original draft: AAA. Validation: J-HL. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Oh-Jun Kwon and Akram Abdo Almansoori contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong-Ho Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal studies were performed after receiving approval of the Seoul National University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The ARRIVE checklist for animal studies was followed.

Competing interests

Akram Abdo Almansoori, Oh-Jun Kwon, Jeong-Hun Nam, Young-Kwon Seo, Hae-Ryong Song, and Jong-Ho Lee declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almansoori, A.A., Kwon, OJ., Nam, JH. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma-impregnated polycaprolactone-β tricalcium phosphate bio-scaffold enhanced bone regeneration around dental implants. Int J Implant Dent 7, 35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00317-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00317-y

Keywords