Skip to main content

Table 3 The relationships between predictor variables and the 3D deviations between the planned and placed implant positions at the entry and tip of the implant body among each surgical guide fabrication methods

From: Accuracy of a novel modified single computed tomography scanning method for assisting dental implant placement: a retrospective observational study

 

Large 3D deviation at the entry of the implant body

Large 3D deviation at the tip of the implant body

Mean ± SD

Correlation coefficient

p value

Mean ± SD

Correlation coefficient

p value

Factors related to each surgical guide

 Sex

  Male

0.642 ± 0.386

–

0.325‡

0.976 ± 0.514

–

0.763‡

  Female

0.667 ± 0.377

–

0.987 ± 0.524

–

 Age at implant placement surgery

–

− 0.102

0.025§

–

− 0.082

0.073§

 Number of coronal teeth

–

− 0.137

0.003§

–

− 0.074

0.106§

 Number of teeth with metal restorations

–

− 0.159

< 0.001§

–

− 0.037

0.418§

 Number of placed implants

–

0.094

0.039§

–

0.056

0.224§

 Dentition defect type

  Class I

0.572 ± 0.335

–

0.002†

0.883 ± 0.443

–

0.006†

  Class II

0.680 ± 0.399

–

0.996 ± 0.524

–

  Class III

0.586 ± 0.333

–

0.890 ± 0.447

–

  Class IV

0.691 ± 0.428

–

1.217 ± 0.622

–

  Edentulism

0.761 ± 0.389

–

1.044 ± 0.559

–

 Number of fixation pins

–

0.137

0.003§

–

0.141

0.002§

Factors related to each implant body

 Shape of implant body

  Straight

0.665 ± 0.405

–

0.876‡

1.167 ± 0.642

–

0.028‡

  Tapered

0.657 ± 0.376

–

0.956 ± 0.495

–

 Implant width

  NP

0.676 ± 0.376

 

0.702†

1.003 ± 0.522

–

0.836†

  RP

0.649 ± 0.383

–

0.972 ± 0.514

–

  WP

0.660 ± 0.376

–

0.993 ± 0.567

–

 Implant length

–

0.103

0.024§

–

0.253

< 0.001§

 Implant location

  Anterior

0.682 ± 0.370

–

0.301‡

1.018 ± 0.545

–

0.472‡

  Posterior

0.649 ± 0.383

–

0.970 ± 0.510

–

 Implant location

  Maxillary

0.678 ± 0.383

–

0.203‡

1.031 ± 0.525

–

0.021‡

  Mandibular

0.635 ± 0.375

–

0.926 ± 0.510

–

 Immediate implant placement

  With

0.833 ± 0.395

–

0.011‡

1.288 ± 0.503

–

0.002‡

  Without

0.648 ± 0.377

–

0.965 ± 0.516

–

 Bone augmentation

  With

0.657 ± 0.405

–

0.81‡

1.095 ± 0.720

–

0.510‡

  Without

0.658 ± 0.378

–

0.974 ± 0.501

–

 Alveolar bone quality

–

− 0.008

0.859§

–

− 0.009

0.839§

 Distance between guide sleeve bottom to bone surface

–

0.070

0.123§

–

0.051

0.262§

 Bone surface inclination X

–

− 0.109

0.017§

–

− 0.020

0.664§

 Bone surface inclination Y

–

− 0.141

0.002§

–

− 0.087

0.057§

  1. Bold means p < 0.05
  2. 3D: three-dimensional, NP: narrow platform, RP: regular platform, WP: wide platform
  3. †Kruskal–Wallis test
  4. ‡Mann–Whitney U test
  5. §Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient