Table 5 Descriptive statistics for comparison of measurement methods in per cent
Cleaning method | Threshold method (SW) | Machine learning method (ML) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Contamination level (%) | Contamination level (%) | ||
Group NC (n = 7) | M | 0.041 | 0.065 |
SD | 0.013 | 0.018 | |
Mdn | 0.036 | 0.069 | |
IQA | 0.017 | 0.025 | |
Group CP (n = 7) | M | 0.008 | 0.006 |
SD | 0.005 | 0.005 | |
Mdn | 0.010 | 0.006 | |
IQA | 0.008 | 0.007 | |
Group FP (n = 7) | M | 0.007 | 0.003 |
SD | 0.009 | 0.002 | |
Mdn | 0.001 | 0.003 | |
IQA | 0.017 | 0.001 | |
Group SC (n = 7) | M | 0.014 | 0.014 |
SD | 0.011 | 0.014 | |
Mdn | 0.010 | 0.008 | |
IQA | 0.014 | 0.014 | |
Group PL (n = 7) | M | 0.010 | 0.005 |
SD | 0.004 | 0.003 | |
Mdn | 0.011 | 0.004 | |
IQA | 0.003 | 0.004 | |
Group UD (n = 7) | M | 0.010 | 0.011 |
SD | 0.009 | 0.012 | |
Mdn | 0.007 | 0.007 | |
IQA | 0.017 | 0.008 | |
Group LA (n = 7) | M | 0.093 | 0.116 |
SD | 0.096 | 0.101 | |
Mdn | 0.073 | 0.100 | |
IQA | 0.101 | 0.148 | |