Changes of dental anxiety, aesthetic perception and oral health-related quality of life related to influencing factors of patients’ demographics after anterior implant treatment: a prospective study

Xie, Xin; Zhang, Zhengchuan; Zhou, Jing; Deng, Feilong

doi:10.1186/s40729-023-00486-y

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Table 2 Changes of overall MDAS, OSE and OHIP score related to influencing factors of patients' demographics

From: Changes of dental anxiety, aesthetic perception and oral health-related quality of life related to influencing factors of patients’ demographics after anterior implant treatment: a prospective study

Variable	No. patients (%)	Change of overall MDAS score		Change of overall OSE score		Change of overall OHIP score
Variable	No. patients (%)	Mean ± SD	p-value	Mean ± SD	p-value	Mean ± SD	p-value
Age	44.9 ± 12.0 [24–70]
Age ≤ 40	13 (33.3%)	− 0.8 ± 3.2	0.359	27.2 ± 32.4	0.129	− 4.1 ± 8.7	0.189
40 < age ≤ 60	22 (56.4%)	− 1.1 ± 5.7		36.4 ± 29.2		− 6.6 ± 14.9
Age > 60	4 (10.3%)	2.0 ± 2.7		63.0 ± 19.6		− 12.3 ± 7.4
Gender
Male	22 (56.4%)	− 0.7 ± 4.1	0.432	29.0 ± 30.7	0.076	− 2.5 ± 8.5	0.047*
Female	17 (43.6%)	− 0.6 ± 5.6	0.432	45.2 ± 28.8	0.076	− 11.3 ± 15.1	0.047*
Educational status
None/primary/middle school	5 (12.8%)	− 1.4 ± 3.0	0.780	39.2 ± 34.2	0.126	− 7.0 ± 8.1	0.761
College/undergraduate	27 (69.2%)	− 0.6 ± 5.6		41.3 ± 31.5		− 6.8 ± 14.5
MS/PhD	7 (18.0%)	− 0.4 ± 1.5		13.7 ± 11.1		− 4.1 ± 5.6
Tooth loss number
Single	22 (56.4%)	− 0.9 ± 5.2	0.898	36.2 ± 31.3	0.910	− 9.9 ± 14.1	0.063
Multiple	17 (43.6%)	− 0.4 ± 4.2	0.898	35.8 ± 30.6	0.910	− 1.8 ± 8.3	0.063
Smoking habit
Yes	7 (17.9%)	− 0.9 ± 3.5	0.386	44.6 ± 27.5	0.410	− 5.7 ± 7.3	0.840
No	32 (82.1%)	− 0.6 ± 5.0	0.386	34.2 ± 31.3	0.410	− 6.5 ± 13.4	0.840
Simultaneously bone augmentation
Yes	22 (56.4%)	− 0.3 ± 4.0	0.764	29.3 ± 30.0	0.076	− 3.0 ± 9.5	0.069
No	17 (43.6%)	− 1.1 ± 5.6	0.764	44.8 ± 29.9	0.076	− 10.6 ± 14.7	0.069
Loading timing
Immediate	4 (10.3%)	− 0.5 ± 8.2	0.981	35.5 ± 25.0	0.945	− 9.5 ± 12.9	0.404
Delayed	35 (89.7%)	− 0.7 ± 4.4	0.981	36.1 ± 31.4	0.945	− 6.0 ± 12.6	0.404
Prosthesis type
Zirconia	36 (92.3%)	− 0.8 ± 4.8	0.832	36.4 ± 30.6	0.792	− 6.2 ± 13.0	0.178
PFM	3 (7.7%)	0.7 ± 5.0	0.832	32.3 ± 36.6	0.792	− 8.0 ± 1.7	0.178

*p < 0.05 compared to other variable items by Mann–Whitney U test (gender, tooth loss number, smoking habit, simultaneously bone augmentation, loading timing and prosthesis type) and Kruskal–Wallis test by Bonferroni correction (age and educational status)

Back to article page