Fig. 7From: Investigating the implant position reproducibility of optical impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner and 3D-printed models fabricated using an intraoral scannerMean concordance rates of the six scanbodies of the working models fabricated using the silicone impression technique (IMPM), digital models obtained by optical impressions taken using an intraoral scanner (IOSM-6), and working models fabricated using an intraoral scanner and a 3D printer (3DPM). Significant differences were observed between IMPM and IOSM-6 and between IOSM-6 and 3DPM (p < 0.05)Back to article page