Table 1 Selected papers with all data extracted
From: Indications for zygomatic implants: a systematic review
Author/year | Study design | Sample size | Number of ZI | Number of CI | Follow-up (months) | Mean age | ZI survival rate (%) | Classification | Indications | Zygoma concept | Loading protocol | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extreme bone resorption | Avoid graft | Medical considerations | Previous unsuccessful treatment | Cleft palate | Cancer | Unilateral | Bilateral | Quad zygoma | Conventional | Immediate | |||||||||
Becktor et al., 2005 | Retrospective | N = (16) n = (15) | 30 | 74 | 46.4 (9–69) | 94.3 | Cawood and Howell | 10 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 16 | |||||||
Ahlgren et al., 2006 | Retrospective | 13 | 25 | 28 | 35 (11–49) | 59 (49–73) | 100 | No | 5 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 13 | ||||
Landes et al., 2009 | Retrospective | 15 | 36 | 24 | 64.2 (13–102) | 58 (24–79) | 89 | No | 15 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 15 | ||||
Stiévenart et al., 2010 | Retrospective | N = (20) n = (19) | 76 | 12 | 56 (35–75) | 96 | Lekholm and Zarb | 19 | 19 | 10 | 9 | ||||||||
Muñoz et al., 2017 | Retrospective | 10 | 40 | 24 | 57.7 (41–78) | 100 | No | 7 | 3 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
Atalay et al., 2017 | Retrospective | 16 | 32 | 38 | 28 (6–96) | 53 (23–68) | 93.7 | Cawood and Howell | 10 | 6 | 5 | 16 | |||||||
Davó et al., 2018 | RCT | 35 | 128 | 13 | 12 | 58 (43–74) | 96.9 | No | 35 | 35 | 35 | ||||||||
Blanc et al., 2020 | Retrospective | 25 | 76 | 64 | 18.6 (12–26) | 100 | Cawood and Howell | 19 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 14 | 25 | |||
D'Agostino et al., 2021 | Retrospective | 42 | 116 | 70 | 60 (12–162) | 54 (24–76) | 97.4 | Cawood and Howell | 31 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 26 | 16 | 35 | 6 | |||
Laventure et al., 2022 | Retrospective | N = (22) n = (19) | 63 | 27 | 36.2 (13–103) | 63 (46–80) | 97.3 | Cawood and Howell | 11 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 19 | ||||||
Total | 209 | 622 | 338 | 28.5 (12–162) | 57.2 (24–80) | 97 (89–100) | 118 | 29 | 5 | 34 | 7 | 16 | 12 | 74 | 107 | 105 | 104 | ||