Skip to main content

Table 3 Zygomatic implant survival dataset

From: Long-term treatment outcomes with zygomatic implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Patient number

Zygomatic implant number

Number of failed implants

Number of patients failure in

Survival

Follow-up

Mean (months)

Follow-up range (months)

Kahnberg et al. 2007

76

145

5 (3.45%)

4 (5.26%)

96.5

36

N/A

Pellegrino et al. 2020

20

73

2 (2.75%)

2 (10%)

97.3

39.9

 ± 19.5

Aparicio et al. 2014

80

157

5 (3.18%)

2 (2.5%)

96.8

55.4

 ± 234.7

Coppede et al. 2017

42

94

1 (1.06%)

1 (2.38%)

98.9

60

N/A

Davo and Pons 2015

14

68

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

100

60

N/A

Malo et al. 2014

39

92

1 (1.09%)

1 (2.56%)

98.9

60

N/A

Davo, Malevez and Pons 2013

36

69

1 (1.45%)

1 (2.78%)

98.6

60

N/A

Davo 2009

21

39

1 (2.56%)

1 (4.76%)

97.4

60

N/A

Branemark et al. 2004

28

52

3 (5.77%)

3 (10.71%)

94.2

60

60–120

Yates et al. 2013

23

43

6 (13.95%)

6 (26.09%)

86.1

72

48–72

Bedrossian 2010

36

74

2 (2.70%)

2 (5.56%)

97.3

84

− 84

Agliardi et al. 2017

15

42

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

100

85

73–91

Chana et al. 2019

45

88

5 (5.69%)

3 (6.66%)

94.3

90

Not reported

Miglioranca et al. 2012

21

40

1 (2.50%)

1 (4.76%)

97.5

96

Not reported

Fortin 2017

58

107

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

100

101

60–156

Bothur et al. 2015

14

58

2 (3.45%)

1 (7.14%)

96.6

112

69.6–144

Aparicio et al. 2014

22

41

2 (4.88%)

1 (4.55%)

95.1

120

 ± 154.1

Di Cosola et al. 2021

33

67

16 (23.88%)

8 (24.24%)

76.1

142

109–198