Long-term treatment outcomes with zygomatic implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Table 2 Included studies and characteristics (n = 18)

Study	Study type	Zygomatic implant number	Female	Mean age	Age range	Smokers
Kahnberg et al. 2007	Prospective case series	145	57	58	35–77	15
Pellegrino et al. 2020	Prospective case series	73	NR	56.7	± 12.55	9
Aparicio et al. 2014	Retrospective case series	157	55	3.81	42.78–64.78	24
Coppede et al. 2017	Prospective case series	94	32	58	37–79	8
Davo and Pons 2015	Prospective case series	68	10	57.7	41–78	NR
Malo et al. 2014	Retrospective case series	92	30	53.5	32–77	4
Davo, Malevez and Pons 2013	Prospective case series	69	23	57.5	34–79	NR
Davo 2009	Retrospective case series	39	16	51.4	36–72	NR
Branemark et al. 2004	Prospective case series	52	16	58.3	39–79	NR
Yates et al. 2013	Retrospective case series	43	13	NR	NR	6
Bedrossian 2010	Prospective case series	74	22	NR	NR	NR
Agliardi et al. 2017	Prospective case series	42	13	62	46–70	NR
Chana et al. 2019	Retrospective case series	88	23	56.27	± 12.95	14
Miglioranca et al. 2012	Prospective case series	40	13	55	± 6.66	14
Fortin 2017	Retrospective case series	107	40	65.3	± 8	NR
Bothur et al. 2015	Prospective case series	58	9	60	51–78	3
Aparicio et al. 2014	Prospective case series	41	14	63.10	48–80	5
Di Cosola et al. 2021	Retrospective case series	67	17	59.1	NR	7