Skip to main content

Table 3 The secondary outcomes of deviations at mesial–distal, labial–palatal, and coronal–apical directions (mean ± SD)

From: Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study

Group

Static (n = 20)

Dynamic (n = 20)

p-value

Entry deviationa (mm)

 Mesial–distal

− 0.26 ± 0.43

− 0.16 ± 0.34

0.425

 Labial–palatal

0.01 ± 0.58

0.53 ± 0.53

0.005*

 Coronal–apical

0.44 ± 0.81

0.59 ± 0.78

0.556

Apex deviationa (mm)

 Mesial–distal

− 0.51 ± 0.86

− 0.26 ± 0.85

0.346

 Labial–palatal

− 0.01 ± 0.95

0.34 ± 0.50

0.151

 Coronal–apical

0.50 ± 0.81

0.63 ± 0.75

0.618

  1. aA positive at mesial–distal deviation represented that the actual implant position was placed more mesial than the planned one, and vice versa. A positive at labial–palatal deviation represented that the actual implant position was placed more labial than the planned one, and vice versa. A positive at coronal–apical deviation represented that the actual implant position was placed deeper than the planned one and vice versa
  2. *p < 0.05