Skip to main content

Table 1 Implant characteristics at the implant level (n = 32)

From: Immediate versus delayed implant placement in the esthetic zone: a prospective 3D volumetric assessment of peri-implant tissue stability

 

Type 1

Type 4

Total

Implant position

   

 11, 21

3 (18.75%)

3 (18.75%)

6 (18.75%)

 12, 22

6 (37.50%)

3 (18.75%)

9 (28.13%)

 13, 23

4 (25.00%)

1 (6.25%)

5 (15.63%)

 14, 24

2 (12.50%)

5 (31.25%)

7 (21.88%)

 15, 25

1 (6.25%)

4 (25.00%)

5 (15.63%)

Bone grafting

15 (93.75%)

8 (50.00%)

23 (71.88%)

Gap filling

13 (81.25%)

0

13 (81.25%)

 LRG

2 (12.50%)

9 (56.25%)

11 (68.75%)

 OAOT

14 (87.50%)

6 (37.50%)

20 (62.50%)

Primary stability (mean ± SD; Ncm)

42.19 ± 9.12

41.25 ± 18.12

41.72 ± 14.12

  1. LRG lateral ridge augmentation, OAOT one abutment-one time concept