Skip to main content

Table 5 Risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool (2011)

From: Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author and year

Adequate sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding

Incomplete outcome data addressed

Selective outcome reporting

Free of other sources of bias

Estimated potential risk of bias

Aimetti et al. 2018

[21]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low risk

Ben Amara et al. 2021

[23]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low risk

Iorio-Siciliano et al. 2017

[22]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate risk

Iorio-Siciliano et al. 2020

[16]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate risk

Jonker et al. 2021

[18]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low risk

Jung et al. 2013

[17]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

High risk

Jung et al. 2018

[15]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate risk

Machtei et al. 2019

[19]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low risk

Stumbras et al. 2021

[20]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low risk

  1. The studies meeting all of the criteria were classified as having a low risk of bias, while those that did not meet a criterion were classified as having moderate risk. When two or more criteria were not met, the studies were considered to have a high risk of bias