Skip to main content

Table 1 Publications providing medium- and long-term data on the IMZ Implant System

From: Long-term outcome of the IMZ implant system: a retrospective clinical study with a follow-up between 23 and 34 years

Authors

Design

Mean observation time (years)

Patient selection

Type of restoration

Number of patients/implants

Drop-out (%patients/%implants)

Mean marginal bone loss (mm)

Peri-implantitis rate

Survival rate (implants)

Kirsch & Ackermann 1989

Retrospective

Not specified (1–10 years)

Patients with sufficient horizontal and vertical residual bone

SC, FDP, RDP

1401/3088

?/334 (?/10.8%)

Not specified

Not specified

97.8% (excluding drop out)

Spiekermann et al. 1995

Prospective

5.7

No special features

RDP

125/264

Not specified

2–6 (depending on IMZ-implant type)

Not specified

 > 90% (cumulative after 5 years)

Noack et al. 1999

Retrospective

Not specified (1–13 years)

Treatment between 1984 and 1997

SC, FDP, RDP

527/1250

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

81% (cumulative, after 10 years)

Willer et al. 2003

Prospective

Not specified (1–13 years)

No special features

SC, FDP, RDP

541/1250

89/136 (16.5%/10.9%)

Not specified

Not specified

82.4% (cumulative, after 10 years)

Meijer et al. 2003

Prospective

10

- Edentulousness for at least one year

- Problems with retention and stability of the lower denture

RDP

29/58

1/2 (3.4%)

No mean values reported

Not specified

93% (percentage implants lost)

Meijer et al. 2009

Prospective

10

- Severely reduced mandible

-Edentulousness

- Problems with retention and stability of the lower denture

RDP

30/60

1/2 (3.3%)

1.4 ± 1.1

Not specified

93% (percentage implants lost)

Visser et al. (2016)

Prospective

15

- Treated between 1996 and 1999

-Edentulousness for at least 2 years

- Functional problems

RDP

40/160

20/80 (50%)

Not specified

Not specified

88.7%-98.7% (percentage implants lost, range between subgroups)

Our Findings

Retrospective

28.3

- Treated between 1981–1995

- Availability of baseline radiographs

SC, FDP, RDP

94/199

79/167 (84%/83.9%)

2.5 ± 1.8

9.4%

79.5%