Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical records of staged treatment, implant size, HRW changes, GR resorption (in mm) and esthetic evaluations

From: Bone augmentation with autologous tooth shell in the esthetic zone for dental implant restoration: a pilot study

Patient no.

Tooth position

HRW 0

HRW1

HRW2

HRW3

Implant type

HRW gain

GR1

GR2

PES

WES

1

11

4.4

8.5

8.5

7.2

4.0 × 11

4.1

0.0

1.3

8

10

2

13

4.3

10.0

9.3

9.1

4.5 × 9.5

5.0

0.7

0.9

9

9

3

11

1.5

7.1

6.9

6.8

4.0 × 9.5

5.4

0.2

0.3

8

9

21

2.8

7.3

7.1

6.9

4.0 × 9.5

4.3

0.2

0.4

8

9

4

11

1.7

8.2

7.5

7.5

4.0 × 11

5.8

0.7

0.7

7

8

12

0.0

9.0

7.8

7.8

3.5 × 11

7.8

1.2

1.2

7

8

5

22

0.0

11.0

10.0

9.4

4.0 × 9.5

10.0

1.0

1.6

8

9

6

23

3.2

8.3

7.8

7.4

4.0 × 11

4.6

0.5

0.9

9

9

7

11

3.0

9.0

7.6

6.8

4.0 × 11

4.6

1.4

2.2

8

9

8

11

5.0

8.0

7.5

7.1

4.0 × 11

2.5

0.5

0.9

9

9

21

4.0

8.8

8.1

7.7

4.0 × 11

4.1

0.7

1.1

8

9

Mean

/

2.72

8.65

8.01

7.61

/

5.29

0.65

1.05

8.09

8.91

SD

/

1.73

1.12

0.93

0.88

/

2.03

0.43

0.54

0.70

0.54

Median

/

3.00

8.50

7.80

7.40

/

4.60

0.70

0.90

8.00

9.00

95% CI

/

1.56, 3.88

7.90, 9.41

7.38, 8.64

7.02, 8.20

/

3.92, 6.66

0.36, 0.94

0.68,1.41

7.62, 8.56

8.55, 9.27

  1. HRW, horizontal ridge width; HRW 0 and HRW 1, immediately before and after bone augmentation surgery; HRW 2 and HRW 3, the 4th and 19th month post-bone augmentation surgery; GR, graft resorption. Within-group comparisons (paired t-test): HRW gain = HRW 2–HRW 0, p < 0.0001; graft resorption at the 4th month (GR1) = HRW 1–HRW 2, p < 0.001; graft resorption at the 19th month (GR2) = HRW 1–HRW 3, p < 0.0001