|
Study
|
RR
|
[95% Conf. interval]
|
% Weight
|
|---|
|
Beck-Broichsitter et al. [47]
|
0.989
|
0.960
|
1.020
|
21.94
|
|
Ferreira et al. [16]
|
0.994
|
0.977
|
1.011
|
24.27
|
|
Froum et al. [48]
|
1.043
|
0.963
|
1.129
|
11.92
|
|
Oh E et al. [49]
|
0.980
|
0.949
|
1.011
|
21.63
|
|
Hernández-Alfaro et al. [50]
|
0.907
|
0.873
|
0.942
|
20.24
|
|
Park et al. [4]
|
[Excluded]
| | | |
|
Öncü E et al. [19]
|
[Excluded]
| | | |
|
D+L pooled RR
|
0.977
|
0.941
|
1.015
|
100.00
|
- Random-effects model
- Heterogeneity p = 0.000, I2 = 84.8%
- Heterogeneity chi-squared = 26.35 (d.f. = 4) p = 0.000
- I-squared (variation in RR attributable to heterogeneity) = 84.8 estimate of between-study variance; Tau-squared = 0.0014
- Test of RR= 1, z= 1.20 p = 0.229
