Table 5 Correlation between the size of the Schneiderian membrane perforations and the failure rate of the implants placed below perforated membranes
Author/year | Perforation size (in mm) | Implant failure rate (in perforated membranes) | Management of Schneiderian membrane perforations |
|---|---|---|---|
Park et al. [4] | <5 5-10 >10 | 0% (0 de 44) (not specified where each implant was inserted) | Clot formation |
Beck-Broichsitter et al. [47] | <5 >5 | 1,09% (1 de 92) (not specified the size of the perforations where the implant fails) | <5 mm: collagen membrane or fibrin glue or clot. >5 mm: suturing + collagen membrane |
Ferreira et al. [16] | <5 5-10 >10 | 2.3% (6 de 266) 2.7% (4 de 150) 4.7% (5 de 107) | Collagen membrane + reabsorbable suture for all perforations |
Öncü E et al. [19] | <10 | 0% (0 de 15) | PRF (<10 mm ⍉) |
Froum et al. [48] | <10 | 0% (0 de 35) | Resorbable collagen membrane (<10 mm ⍉) |
Oh E et al. [49] | 5-10 | 3% (4 de 134) | Resorbable hemostatic agente Surgicel© (small-moderate perforations) |
Hernández-Alfaro et al. [50] | <5 5-10 >10 | 2,86% (4 de 140) 8,11% (6 de 74) 25,14% (15 de 58) | 0-5⍉—Collagen membrane or (please add "r") suturing 5-10⍉—Collagen membrane + laminar bone >10 ⍉—Laminar bone, buccal fat pad, mandibular bone block |