Skip to main content

Table 3 Information about selected studies including number of patients treated, number of MSFA performed, number of perforations, percentage of perforations recorded, management of the perforation performed, and main complications

From: Management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during maxillary sinus floor augmentation with lateral approach in relation to subsequent implant survival rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author/year

Type of study

Patients (number)

Sinus lift (number)

Perforations (number)

Perforations rate

Management of perforations

Complications

Park et al. [4]

Retrospective cohort

63

65

24

39%

Clot formation

Infection

Beck-Broichsitter et al. [47]

Retrospective cohort

63

79

39

49.3%

<5 mm: collagen memb or fibrin glue or clot.

>5 mm: suturing + collagen memb

Periimplantitis

Ferreira et al. [16]

Retrospective cohort

531

745

237

31.8%

Collagen membr + Reabsorbable suture for all perforations

Areas with chronic inflammatory infiltration

Öncü E et al. [19]

Retrospective cohort

16

20

10

50%

PRF (<10 mm í–°)

 

Froum et al. [48]

Retrospective cohort

23

40

15

37.5%

Resorbable collagen membrane (<10 mm

í–°)

 

Oh E et al. [49]

Retrospective cohort

128

175

60

34%

Resorbable hemostatic agente Surgicel© (small-moderate perforations)

Infection in 3 of the 60 perforations

Hernández-Alfaro et al. [50]

Retrospective cohort

338

474

104

22%

0-5í–°-collagen membr o suturing 5-10í–°-collagen membr + laminar bone

>10 í–°-laminar bone, buccal fat pad, mandibular bone block

Pain/sensitivity

Total

 

1162

1598

489

30.6%

The main treatment was collagen membrane

Infection was the most frequent complication