Skip to main content

Table 2 Horizontal facial hard and soft tissues and mucosal contour changes following immediate implant placement

From: CBCT analysis of the tissue thickness at immediate implant placement with contour augmentation in the maxillary anterior zone: a 1-year prospective clinical study

Measurement

Preoperative

1 year after prosthesis connection

P-value*

Median (Min; Max) mm

Mean (SD) mm

Median (Min; Max) mm

Mean (SD) mm

Test group (n=10)

 BW

PL0

2.85 (0.6; 3.0)

2.71 (0.42)

1.90 (1.3; 3.3)

2.21 (0.57)

0.019

PL2

2.40 (1.6; 3.1)

2.36 (0.42)

2.10 (1.5; 3.4)

2.26 (0.57)

0.474

 GW

PL0

1.25 (0.8; 1.5)

1.19 (0.21)

2.60 (2.0; 3.2)

2.56 (0.30)

0.005

PL2

1.35 (0.9; 1.7)

1.37 (0.26)

2.65 (2.1; 2.8)

2.57 (0.24)

0.005

 TW

PL0

3.85 (3.1; 4.8)

3.90 (0.46)

4.80 (3.6; 5.7)

4.77 (0.61)

0.005

PL2

4.00 (2.6; 4.3)

3.73 (0.57)

4.80 (3.6; 6.0)

4.83 (0.68)

0.005

Control group (n=10)

 BW

PL0

2.30 (1.2; 3.9)

2.28 (0.76)

1.75 (1.2; 2.7)

1.81 (0.40)

0.021

PL2

2.00 (0.9; 3.9)

2.03 (0.75)

2.00 (1.0; 3.0)

1.97 (0.53)

0.720

 GW

PL0

1.25 (0.9; 2.3)

1.43 (0.45)

1.35 (0.9; 2.2)

1.44 (0.40)

0.887

PL2

1.50 (1.1; 1.9)

1.53 (0.26)

1.60 (1.0; 2.1)

1.56 (0.34)

0.524

 TW

PL0

4.05 (2.1; 5.1)

3.71 (0.96)

3.25 (2.1; 4.3)

3.25 (0.68)

0.049

PL2

3.65 (2.3; 5.4)

3.56 (0.85)

3.50 (2.1; 4.7)

3.53 (0.82)

0.905

  1. *Wilcoxon signed-rank test; a significance level of 0.05 was used.
  2. PL0 Implant platform level, PL2 2 mm Apical to the implant platform level, BW The horizontal distance from the implant surface to the facial bone surface, GW The horizontal width of the soft tissue, TW The sum of BW and GW