Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of comparative studies

From: Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study Study location Study type Onlay graft donor site Defect type Age (years) Smokers (%) Number of implant (patients) Implant location Implant success Bone loss from grafted level Timing of implant in DP group (months) Post-loading follow-up
Misch and Dietsh 1994 [16] USA RS Iliac V and H NR NR SP 21 (-)
DP 147 (-)
Mx
Mx
NR NR NR 26–97 months
Triplett and Schow 1996 [17] USA RS Iliac and cranium V and H NR NR SP 65 (NR)
DP 110 (NR)
Mx and Mn
Mx and Mn
84.6
88.2
NR 4–8 Minimum 1 year
Widmark et al. 2001 [18] Sweden RS Iliac V and H NR NR SP 68 (NR)
DP 33 (NR)
Mx and Mn
Mx and Mn
NR NR 3–4 5 years
Peñarrocha-Diago et al. 2013 [9] Spain RS Intraoral H Range 21–82 42.8 SP 38 (20)
DP 33 (22)
NR
NR
89.5a
96.9
0.69± 0.67
0.20± 0.50
5–8 1 year
Tosun et al. 2017 [19] Turkey RS Iliac NR 49.3± 11.8 NR SP 42 (-)
DP 61 (-)
13 Mx, 29 Mn
48 Mx, 13 Mn
NR 1.31± 0.95
0.49± 076
3 29 ± 4.2
  1. NR Not reported, V Vertical, H Horizontal, Mx Maxilla, Mn Mandible, SP Simultaneous placement, DP Delayed placement
  2. aBuser’s criteria