Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of comparative studies

From: Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Study location

Study type

Onlay graft donor site

Defect type

Age (years)

Smokers (%)

Number of implant (patients)

Implant location

Implant success

Bone loss from grafted level

Timing of implant in DP group (months)

Post-loading follow-up

Misch and Dietsh 1994 [16]

USA

RS

Iliac

V and H

NR

NR

SP 21 (-)

DP 147 (-)

Mx

Mx

NR

NR

NR

26–97 months

Triplett and Schow 1996 [17]

USA

RS

Iliac and cranium

V and H

NR

NR

SP 65 (NR)

DP 110 (NR)

Mx and Mn

Mx and Mn

84.6

88.2

NR

4–8

Minimum 1 year

Widmark et al. 2001 [18]

Sweden

RS

Iliac

V and H

NR

NR

SP 68 (NR)

DP 33 (NR)

Mx and Mn

Mx and Mn

NR

NR

3–4

5 years

Peñarrocha-Diago et al. 2013 [9]

Spain

RS

Intraoral

H

Range 21–82

42.8

SP 38 (20)

DP 33 (22)

NR

NR

89.5a

96.9

0.69± 0.67

0.20± 0.50

5–8

1 year

Tosun et al. 2017 [19]

Turkey

RS

Iliac

NR

49.3± 11.8

NR

SP 42 (-)

DP 61 (-)

13 Mx, 29 Mn

48 Mx, 13 Mn

NR

1.31± 0.95

0.49± 076

3

29 ± 4.2

  1. NR Not reported, V Vertical, H Horizontal, Mx Maxilla, Mn Mandible, SP Simultaneous placement, DP Delayed placement
  2. aBuser’s criteria