Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical data on the volume of bone-filling material in procedures using Bio-Oss® and Cytrans®

From: Comparison of the performances of low-crystalline carbonate apatite and Bio-Oss in sinus augmentation using three-dimensional image analysis

Treatment group Patient no. Age Gender Deficit condition (FDI) T2 (ml) T3 (ml) Absorbed amount (%)
Bio-Oss® (n = 8) 1 65 F Edentulous 3.762 2.538 32.50
2 59 M 23–27 1.583 1.167 26.30
3 53 M 26, 27 2.271 1.772 22.00
4 59 F 14–17 4.880 3.836 21.40
5 21 F 14–16 1.428 0.916 35.90
6 70 F 26, 27 2.163 1.622 25.00
7 71 F Edentulous 2.436 1.973 19.00
8 71 F Edentulous 3.198 2.581 19.30
Cytrans® (n = 6) 1 67 F 14–17 2.547 2.371 6.90
2 41 F 16, 17 2.108 1.791 15.00
3 59 M 25–27 1.506 1.222 18.90
4 67 M Edentulous 3.763 3.375 10.30
5 67 M Edentulous 2.392 2.150 10.10
6 67 F 24–27 2.780 2.386 14.20