Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical data on the volume of bone-filling material in procedures using Bio-Oss® and Cytrans®

From: Comparison of the performances of low-crystalline carbonate apatite and Bio-Oss in sinus augmentation using three-dimensional image analysis

Treatment group

Patient no.

Age

Gender

Deficit condition (FDI)

T2 (ml)

T3 (ml)

Absorbed amount (%)

Bio-Oss® (n = 8)

1

65

F

Edentulous

3.762

2.538

32.50

2

59

M

23–27

1.583

1.167

26.30

3

53

M

26, 27

2.271

1.772

22.00

4

59

F

14–17

4.880

3.836

21.40

5

21

F

14–16

1.428

0.916

35.90

6

70

F

26, 27

2.163

1.622

25.00

7

71

F

Edentulous

2.436

1.973

19.00

8

71

F

Edentulous

3.198

2.581

19.30

Cytrans® (n = 6)

1

67

F

14–17

2.547

2.371

6.90

2

41

F

16, 17

2.108

1.791

15.00

3

59

M

25–27

1.506

1.222

18.90

4

67

M

Edentulous

3.763

3.375

10.30

5

67

M

Edentulous

2.392

2.150

10.10

6

67

F

24–27

2.780

2.386

14.20