Skip to main content

Table 1 Values presented with mean and standard deviation

From: Fractal analysis as a useful predictor for determining osseointegration of dental implant? A retrospective study

Variables

Total

Sex

p1

Female

Male

t0 roi1

1.26 ± 0.11 (a)

1.27 ± 0.11 (a)

1.25 ± 0.11 (a)

0.403

t1 roi1

1.15 ± 0.11 (b)

1.14 ± 0.09 (b)

1.16 ± 0.13 (b)

0.603

t2 roi1

1.18 ± 0.11 (b)

1.17 ± 0.09 (b)

1.19 ± 0.13 (ab)

0.371

t3 roi1

1.24 ± 0.11 (c)

1.25 ± 0.1 (a)

1.23 ± 0.11 (a)

0.522

p2

< 0.05

< 0.05

< 0.05

 

t0 roi2

1.35 ± 0.1 (a)

1.35 ± 0.09 (a)

1,35 ± 0.11 (a)

0.960

t1 roi2

1.22 ± 0.14 (b)

1.2 ± 0.11 (b)

1,24 ± 0.17 (b)

0.306

t2 roi2

1.23 ± 0.13 (b)

1.22 ± 0.11 (b)

1.25 ± 0.15 (b)

0.341

t3 roi2

1.3 ± 0.1 (c)

1.31 ± 0.07 (c)

1.29 ± 0.12 (b)

0.489

p2

< 0.05

< 0.05

< 0.05

 

t0 roi3

1.37 ± 0.08 (a)

1.37 ± 0.09 (a)

1.37 ± 0.07 (a)

0.911

t1 roi3

1.24 ± 0.11 (b)

1.23 ± 0.12 (b)

1.25 ± 0.1 (b)

0.435

t2 roi3

1.26 ± 0.11 (b)

1.24 ± 0.1 (b)

1.29 ± 0.1 (bc)

0.071

t3 roi3

1.33 ± 0.09 (c)

1.34 ± 0.1 (c)

1.32 ± 0.07 (c)

0.622

p2

< 0.05

< 0.05

< 0.05

 

t0 FDmean

1.33 ± 0.07 (a)

1.33 ± 0.07 (a)

1.32 ± 0.08 (a)

0.629

t1 FDmean

1.2 ± 0.09 (b)

1.19 ± 0.07 (b)

1.22 ± 0.1 (b)

0.264

t2 FDmean

1.22 ± 0.08 (b)

1.21 ± 0.06 (b)

1.24 ± 0.1 (b)

0.094

t3 FDmean

1.29 ± 0.08 (c)

1.3 ± 0.07 (c)

1.28 ± 0.08 (c)

0.431

p2

< 0.05

< 0.05

< 0.05

 
  1. Repeated measures ANOVA analysis was used. t0 before implant, t1 0 to 7 days after surgery, t2 1 month after surgery, t3 2 months after surgery, roi1 mesial surface, roi2 distal surface, roi3 apical surface, p1 comparison between groups, p2 in-group comparison, (abc) different letters in the same column represent statistical significance