Skip to main content

Table 1 Values presented with mean and standard deviation

From: Fractal analysis as a useful predictor for determining osseointegration of dental implant? A retrospective study

Variables Total Sex p1
Female Male
t0 roi1 1.26 ± 0.11 (a) 1.27 ± 0.11 (a) 1.25 ± 0.11 (a) 0.403
t1 roi1 1.15 ± 0.11 (b) 1.14 ± 0.09 (b) 1.16 ± 0.13 (b) 0.603
t2 roi1 1.18 ± 0.11 (b) 1.17 ± 0.09 (b) 1.19 ± 0.13 (ab) 0.371
t3 roi1 1.24 ± 0.11 (c) 1.25 ± 0.1 (a) 1.23 ± 0.11 (a) 0.522
p2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05  
t0 roi2 1.35 ± 0.1 (a) 1.35 ± 0.09 (a) 1,35 ± 0.11 (a) 0.960
t1 roi2 1.22 ± 0.14 (b) 1.2 ± 0.11 (b) 1,24 ± 0.17 (b) 0.306
t2 roi2 1.23 ± 0.13 (b) 1.22 ± 0.11 (b) 1.25 ± 0.15 (b) 0.341
t3 roi2 1.3 ± 0.1 (c) 1.31 ± 0.07 (c) 1.29 ± 0.12 (b) 0.489
p2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05  
t0 roi3 1.37 ± 0.08 (a) 1.37 ± 0.09 (a) 1.37 ± 0.07 (a) 0.911
t1 roi3 1.24 ± 0.11 (b) 1.23 ± 0.12 (b) 1.25 ± 0.1 (b) 0.435
t2 roi3 1.26 ± 0.11 (b) 1.24 ± 0.1 (b) 1.29 ± 0.1 (bc) 0.071
t3 roi3 1.33 ± 0.09 (c) 1.34 ± 0.1 (c) 1.32 ± 0.07 (c) 0.622
p2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05  
t0 FDmean 1.33 ± 0.07 (a) 1.33 ± 0.07 (a) 1.32 ± 0.08 (a) 0.629
t1 FDmean 1.2 ± 0.09 (b) 1.19 ± 0.07 (b) 1.22 ± 0.1 (b) 0.264
t2 FDmean 1.22 ± 0.08 (b) 1.21 ± 0.06 (b) 1.24 ± 0.1 (b) 0.094
t3 FDmean 1.29 ± 0.08 (c) 1.3 ± 0.07 (c) 1.28 ± 0.08 (c) 0.431
p2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05  
  1. Repeated measures ANOVA analysis was used. t0 before implant, t1 0 to 7 days after surgery, t2 1 month after surgery, t3 2 months after surgery, roi1 mesial surface, roi2 distal surface, roi3 apical surface, p1 comparison between groups, p2 in-group comparison, (abc) different letters in the same column represent statistical significance