Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies excluded with reasons

From: Socket seal surgery techniques in the esthetic zone: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

Author

Year

Title

Reason for exclusion

Araujo and Lindhe [4]

2015

Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial.

Compare alveolar ridge preservation with bone graft versus spontaneous healing

Ávila-Ortiz et al.

2020

Efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled trial

Compare alveolar ridge preservation with bone graft versus spontaneous healing

Cardaropoli et al. [5]

2012

Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis

Compare alveolar ridge preservation with bone graft versus spontaneous healing

Hu et al.

2009

Clinical study of tissue preservation of extraction socket with bio-oss collagen and acellular dermal matrix.

Compare alveolar ridge preservation with bone graft versus spontaneous healing

Neiva et al.

2011

Analysis of tissue neogenesis in extraction sockets treated with guided bone regeneration: clinical, histologic, and micro-CT.

Socket sealing with coronally advanced flap.

Oghli et al.

2010

Ridge preservation following tooth extraction: a comparison between atraumatic extraction and socket seal surgery.

Compare different bone filler per group

Park et al.

2016

The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation

Includes molar area

Sadatmansouri et al.

2013

Comparison of dPTFE and FGG for socket bone augmentation: a clinical and histological study

Different language

Thalmair et al. [40]

2013

Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques - a volumetric study.

Compare different bone filler per group