Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies excluded with reasons

From: Socket seal surgery techniques in the esthetic zone: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

Author Year Title Reason for exclusion
Araujo and Lindhe [4] 2015 Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Compare alveolar ridge preservation with bone graft versus spontaneous healing
Ávila-Ortiz et al. 2020 Efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled trial Compare alveolar ridge preservation with bone graft versus spontaneous healing
Cardaropoli et al. [5] 2012 Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis Compare alveolar ridge preservation with bone graft versus spontaneous healing
Hu et al. 2009 Clinical study of tissue preservation of extraction socket with bio-oss collagen and acellular dermal matrix. Compare alveolar ridge preservation with bone graft versus spontaneous healing
Neiva et al. 2011 Analysis of tissue neogenesis in extraction sockets treated with guided bone regeneration: clinical, histologic, and micro-CT. Socket sealing with coronally advanced flap.
Oghli et al. 2010 Ridge preservation following tooth extraction: a comparison between atraumatic extraction and socket seal surgery. Compare different bone filler per group
Park et al. 2016 The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation Includes molar area
Sadatmansouri et al. 2013 Comparison of dPTFE and FGG for socket bone augmentation: a clinical and histological study Different language
Thalmair et al. [40] 2013 Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques - a volumetric study. Compare different bone filler per group