Skip to main content
International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Table 3 CTRAM placement discrepancy

From: Volumetric changes in edentulous alveolar ridge sites utilizing guided bone regeneration and a custom titanium ridge augmentation matrix (CTRAM): a case series study

Subject ID

Point 1 difference (mm)

Point 2 difference (mm)

Point 3 difference (mm)

Point 4 difference (mm)

Mean difference (mm)

1

0.56

0.31

0.31

0.41

0.39

2

0.26

0.09

0.35

0.54

0.31

3

1.07

1.13

0.76

0.68

0.91

4

0.65

0.98

0.83

0.92

0.85

5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

6

0.89

1.61

1.97

0.85

1.33

7

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

8

2.47

2.20

3.64

3.37

2.92

9

0.47

0.90

1.16

1.11

0.91

Overall

    

1.089 ± 0.81

  1. Linear distance in millimeters from designated points on CTRAM: planned location (in CAD software) vs. location on post-treatment CBCT. Post-treatment CBCT on subjects 5 and 7 (early CTRAM removal) were obtained following removal of CTRAM, and positional comparison could not be made
Back to article page