Skip to main content

Table 3 CTRAM placement discrepancy

From: Volumetric changes in edentulous alveolar ridge sites utilizing guided bone regeneration and a custom titanium ridge augmentation matrix (CTRAM): a case series study

Subject ID Point 1 difference (mm) Point 2 difference (mm) Point 3 difference (mm) Point 4 difference (mm) Mean difference (mm)
1 0.56 0.31 0.31 0.41 0.39
2 0.26 0.09 0.35 0.54 0.31
3 1.07 1.13 0.76 0.68 0.91
4 0.65 0.98 0.83 0.92 0.85
5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6 0.89 1.61 1.97 0.85 1.33
7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
8 2.47 2.20 3.64 3.37 2.92
9 0.47 0.90 1.16 1.11 0.91
Overall      1.089 ± 0.81
  1. Linear distance in millimeters from designated points on CTRAM: planned location (in CAD software) vs. location on post-treatment CBCT. Post-treatment CBCT on subjects 5 and 7 (early CTRAM removal) were obtained following removal of CTRAM, and positional comparison could not be made