Skip to main content

Table 2 Qualitative analysis of surfaces after electrolysis under different conditions. Three examiners independently scored each surface based on 4 SEM images mean ± SD

From: Investigation of different electrochemical cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments in vitro: an approach for metal surface decontamination

 

Mean roughness score of 4 SEM images per electrolysis of different charges and currents

Mean all examiners

P value compared to Control

Ex 1

Ex 2

Ex 3

Control

2.00 ± 0.00

2.00 ± 0.00

2.00 ± 0.00

2.00 ± 0.00

-

− 1 A, group I

4.00 ± 0.00

3.00 ± 0.00

3.25 ± 0.50

3.42 ± 0.17

*

− 1.5 A, group I

4.00 ± 0.00

3.75 ± 0.50

4.00 ± 0.00

3.92 ± 0.17

*

+ 1 A, group I

3.25 ± 0.50

3.33 ± 0.58

3.75 ± 0.50

3.44 ± 0.53

*

+ 1.5 A, group I

3.25 ± 0.50

4.00 ± 0.00

3.75 ± 0.50

3.67 ± 0.33

*

− 1 A, group III

2.00 ± 0.50

2.00 ± 0.00

2.00 ± 0.00

2.00 ± 0.17

n.s.

− 1.5 A, group III

4.00 ± 0.00

3.00 ± 0.00

3.00 ± 0.00

3.33 ± 0.00

*

+ 1 A, group III

3.00 ± 0.00

4.00 ± 0.00

3.25 ± 0.50

3.42 ± 0.17

*

+ 1.5 A, group III

3.00 ± 0.00

4.00 ± 0.00

4.00 ± 0.00

3.67 ± 0.00

*

  1. n.s. no significance; *P < 0.05