Skip to main content

Table 5 Characteristics of studies included in this review

From: Marginal bone loss around oral implants supporting fixed versus removable prostheses: a systematic review

Author (year)

Study design/follow-up (years)a

Patients

Age (mean±SD/range)

Region

Status

Type of prosthesis

No. of implants

Overall

FISP/RISP (no. of implants per patient)

Palmqvist et al. 1996 [29]

PS (not randomized)/4,9

n = 30

NRb

Maxilla

Fully edentulous

15 FISP

15 RISP

Overall: 60

FISP: NRb

RISP: NRb

Cune et al. 1996 [30]

RS/1

n = 74

55.1 ± 12.1

18.5–83.1

Maxilla

Mandible

Fully edentulous

10 FISP

50 RISP

Overall: 235

FISP: NRb

RISP: NRb

Makkonen et al. 1997 [32]

PS (not randomized)/5

n = 33

39–75

Mandible

Fully edentulous

13 FISP

20 RISP

Overall: 155

FISP: 5-6

RISP: 4

Tinsley et al. 2001 [33]

PS (randomized)/5

n = 48

37–80

Mandible

Fully edentulous

21 FISP

27 RISP

Overall: 181

FISP: 5

RISP: 2-3

Raghoebar et al. 2003 [34]

PS (not randomized)/3

n = 40

56

30–70

Mandible

Fully edentulous

10 FISP

30 RISP

Overall: 170

FISP: 5

RISP: 4

Quirynen et al. 2004 [31]

PS (not randomized)/10

n = 37

59.3

36–85

Mandible

Fully edentulous

12 FISP

25 RISP

NRb

  1. aPS: prospective study, RS: retrospective study
  2. bNR: not reported