Skip to main content

Table 5 Characteristics of studies included in this review

From: Marginal bone loss around oral implants supporting fixed versus removable prostheses: a systematic review

Author (year) Study design/follow-up (years)a Patients Age (mean±SD/range) Region Status Type of prosthesis No. of implants
Overall
FISP/RISP (no. of implants per patient)
Palmqvist et al. 1996 [29] PS (not randomized)/4,9 n = 30 NRb Maxilla Fully edentulous 15 FISP
15 RISP
Overall: 60
FISP: NRb
RISP: NRb
Cune et al. 1996 [30] RS/1 n = 74 55.1 ± 12.1
18.5–83.1
Maxilla
Mandible
Fully edentulous 10 FISP
50 RISP
Overall: 235
FISP: NRb
RISP: NRb
Makkonen et al. 1997 [32] PS (not randomized)/5 n = 33 39–75 Mandible Fully edentulous 13 FISP
20 RISP
Overall: 155
FISP: 5-6
RISP: 4
Tinsley et al. 2001 [33] PS (randomized)/5 n = 48 37–80 Mandible Fully edentulous 21 FISP
27 RISP
Overall: 181
FISP: 5
RISP: 2-3
Raghoebar et al. 2003 [34] PS (not randomized)/3 n = 40 56
30–70
Mandible Fully edentulous 10 FISP
30 RISP
Overall: 170
FISP: 5
RISP: 4
Quirynen et al. 2004 [31] PS (not randomized)/10 n = 37 59.3
36–85
Mandible Fully edentulous 12 FISP
25 RISP
NRb
  1. aPS: prospective study, RS: retrospective study
  2. bNR: not reported