Skip to main content

Table 2 The collected information around type of the studies, dental implant systems, applied denture type, the rate of implant survival, and the period of time that patients were followed-up

From: Applying dental implant therapy in patients with oral lichen planus: a review of literature

AuthorsType of studyNumber of applied
implants
Implant systems and featuresApplied denture typeSurvival rate of the implants (%)Follow-up period (months)
Esposito et al. [42]Case report4Straumann TL and micro rough surfaceOverdenture10021
Oczakir et al. [3]Retrospective study4Straumann TL and micro rough surfaceFixed complete
denture
10072
Reichart [39]Case report10HaTi [2],
Camlog [1],
micro rough surface
ZL-Duraplant [1], micro rough
and anodically oxidized surface [6]
Fixed partial
prostheses
100156
Czerninski et al. [43]Retrospective study3NAFixed partial
prosthesis
036
Gallego et al. [44]Case report2NAOverdenture036
Hernandez et al. [10]Prospective study56Nobel Biocare, micro rough and anodically oxidized surfaceFixed partial
prostheses
10053.5
Diz et al. [43, 45]Retrospective study54NANA10063
Lopez-Jornet
et al. [46]
Cross-sectional study56NA3 Overdentures
13 fixed partial
prostheses
Implant survival rate: NA
peri-implant mucositis: 10
peri-implantitis: 14
bone loss: 10
mobility: 2
42
Total 191  0–100%
weighed mean
95.3%
Weighed mean
53.8 SD ± 18.3