Table 2 The collected information around type of the studies, dental implant systems, applied denture type, the rate of implant survival, and the period of time that patients were followed-up
From: Applying dental implant therapy in patients with oral lichen planus: a review of literature
Authors | Type of study | Number of applied implants | Implant systems and features | Applied denture type | Survival rate of the implants (%) | Follow-up period (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Esposito et al. [42] | Case report | 4 | Straumann TL and micro rough surface | Overdenture | 100 | 21 |
Oczakir et al. [3] | Retrospective study | 4 | Straumann TL and micro rough surface | Fixed complete denture | 100 | 72 |
Reichart [39] | Case report | 10 | HaTi [2], Camlog [1], micro rough surface ZL-Duraplant [1], micro rough and anodically oxidized surface [6] | Fixed partial prostheses | 100 | 156 |
Czerninski et al. [43] | Retrospective study | 3 | NA | Fixed partial prosthesis | 0 | 36 |
Gallego et al. [44] | Case report | 2 | NA | Overdenture | 0 | 36 |
Hernandez et al. [10] | Prospective study | 56 | Nobel Biocare, micro rough and anodically oxidized surface | Fixed partial prostheses | 100 | 53.5 |
Retrospective study | 54 | NA | NA | 100 | 63 | |
Lopez-Jornet et al. [46] | Cross-sectional study | 56 | NA | 3 Overdentures 13 fixed partial prostheses | Implant survival rate: NA peri-implant mucositis: 10 peri-implantitis: 14 bone loss: 10 mobility: 2 | 42 |
Total |  | 191 |  |  | 0–100% weighed mean 95.3% | Weighed mean 53.8 SD ± 18.3 |