Skip to main content

Table 2 The collected information around type of the studies, dental implant systems, applied denture type, the rate of implant survival, and the period of time that patients were followed-up

From: Applying dental implant therapy in patients with oral lichen planus: a review of literature

Authors Type of study Number of applied
implants
Implant systems and features Applied denture type Survival rate of the implants (%) Follow-up period (months)
Esposito et al. [42] Case report 4 Straumann TL and micro rough surface Overdenture 100 21
Oczakir et al. [3] Retrospective study 4 Straumann TL and micro rough surface Fixed complete
denture
100 72
Reichart [39] Case report 10 HaTi [2],
Camlog [1],
micro rough surface
ZL-Duraplant [1], micro rough
and anodically oxidized surface [6]
Fixed partial
prostheses
100 156
Czerninski et al. [43] Retrospective study 3 NA Fixed partial
prosthesis
0 36
Gallego et al. [44] Case report 2 NA Overdenture 0 36
Hernandez et al. [10] Prospective study 56 Nobel Biocare, micro rough and anodically oxidized surface Fixed partial
prostheses
100 53.5
Diz et al. [43, 45] Retrospective study 54 NA NA 100 63
Lopez-Jornet
et al. [46]
Cross-sectional study 56 NA 3 Overdentures
13 fixed partial
prostheses
Implant survival rate: NA
peri-implant mucositis: 10
peri-implantitis: 14
bone loss: 10
mobility: 2
42
Total   191    0–100%
weighed mean
95.3%
Weighed mean
53.8 SD ± 18.3