Skip to main content

Table 3 Accuracy of open and closed tray impression techniques for both parallel and non-parallel implant systems

From: Implant impression accuracy of parallel and non-parallel implants: a comparative in-vitro analysis of open and closed tray techniques

Impression technique

Implant system

Angulations

Count

Median

Mean

SD

P value

Open tray

Straumann

Parallel

16

0.017

0.028

0.031

0.926

Non-parallel

16

0.015

0.045

0.054

SIC Invent

Parallel

16

0.019

0.040

0.045

0.999

Non-parallel

16

0.020

0.034

0.030

Osstem

Parallel

16

0.008

0.021

0.038

0.0166*

Non-parallel

16

0.016

0.037

0.047

Closed tray

Strauman

Parallel

16

0.015

0.034

0.037

0.196

Non-parallel

16

0.016

0.043

0.045

SIC Invent

Parallel

16

0.028

0.040

0.036

0.616

Non-parallel

16

0.041

0.053

0.053

Osstem

Parallel

16

0.026

0.049

0.052

0.423

Non-parallel

16

0.039

0.075

0.078

  1. *Mann-Whitney U test, P value < 0.05 statistically significant