Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics and individual results included studies

From: Effect of dental implant surface roughness in patients with a history of periodontal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study (first author and year of publication)

Ā 

Design

General health

Perio health

Perio status

Perio diagnosis

Smoking status

Smokers (%)

Perio recall x/year

Follow-up (months)

Follow-up range

No. of patients

Mean age

Dental status

Implants surface

No. of implants

Aglietta, 2010

Retro

Yes

Yes

PHPHPCPC

Chronic

SSSS

100

Regular

120

ND

10

10

10

10

51.2

51.5

51.3

51.7

Partial

MSRSMSRS

10

10

10

10

Sayardoust, 2013

Retro

Yes

Yes

PCPCPCPC

Advanced

NSNSSSSS

50

Regular

60

ND

20

20

20

20

59.8

63.2

54.2

53.5

Partial and full

MSRSMSRS

66

52

78

56

Wennstrƶm, 2004

Pros

Yes

Yes

PCPC

Moderate-to-advanced chronic

S and NS

33

2ā€“3/years

60

ND

51

59.5

Partial

MSRS

67

70

Matarasso, 2010

Retro

Yes

Yes

PCPCPHPH

Chronic

NSNSNSNS

O

Regular

120

ND

20

20

20

20

47.2

46.5

47.5

48.1

Partial

MSRSMSRS

20

20

20

20

Nicu, 2012

Pros

Yes

Yes

PCPC

Moderate to severe chronic

S and NS

44

Regular

36

ND

1818

55.4

55.4

Partial and full

MSRS

39

39

Gallego, 2018

Retro

5.3% controlled diabetes

Yes

PCPCPC

Mild to Advanced

S and NS

28

3ā€“4/years

36

ND

27

74

167

61. 0

61.2

61.1

Partial

MSHSRS

72

14

55

38

Ā 

Site of placement1. Max and/or mand2. Ant and/or post

Stage

AB

Early implant loss (%)

Late implant loss (%)

Implant survival (%)

Implant mean marginal bone loss

Implant mean marginal bone loss range

Implant mean attach level loss

Implant mean attachment level Loss range

BoP (%)

Peri-implantitis (%)

Type of prosthesis

Screw-retained or Cemented

Implant surface

Aglietta, 2010

1. Max and mand2. Ant and post

2121

NR

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

90.0

100

90.0

80.0

2.65

2.51

3.47

3.77

0.31

0.31

1.09

1.43

ND

ND

18.1

20.1

19.3

18.7

ND

Single unit

NR

Turned, TPS surface

Sayardoust, 2013

1. Max and mand2. NR

2

No

2.5

3.1

12.1

3.0

0.6

0.8

3.0

0.8

96.9

96.1

84.9

96.2

0.84

1.26

1.54

1.16

0.14

0.15

0.21

0.15

ND

ND

<ā€‰ 15%

ND

Single unit, FPD

Screw

Turned, oxidized surface

Wennstrƶm, 2004

1. Max and mand2. Ant and post

2

Yes

1.45

0.0

1.45

9.3

97.1

98.6

0.33

0.48

1.07

0.95

ND

ND

5.0

4.7

FPD, extension FPSā€™s

Screw

Turned, TiO2-blasted surface

Matarasso, 2010

1. Max and mand2. Ant and post

2121

NR

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

5.0

15.0

5.0

5.0

95.0

85.0

95.0

95.0

2.78

2.32

1.95

1.43

0.48

0.41

0.42

0.38

ND

ND

ND

ND

Single unit

NR

Turned, TPS

Nicu, 2012

1. Max and mand2. Ant and post

2

Yes

4.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

95.8

100

0.98

1.02

0.63

0.72

3.44.0

1.41.9

59

69

ND

FPD, overdenture

Screw

Turned, TiUnite

Gallego, 2018

1. Mand2. Post

1

Yes

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100

100

100

0.96

0.77

1.48

0.49

0. 60

1.09

ND

ND

9.6

13.5

13.0

ND

FPD

Screw

Turned, osseotite, TiUnite