Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of implant survival and implant success in autogenous bone grafts

From: Survival of dental implants placed in autogenous bone grafts and bone flaps in head and neck oncology patients: a systematic review

 

Implant survival

Implant success

Author

Year of publication

Donor site of autogenous bone graft

Radiotherapy/chemotherapy to bone graft site

Complications

No. of patients who had implants placed into autogenous bone grafts (and failures)

Overall patient implant survival in autogenous bone grafts

No. of implants placed into autogenous bone grafts (and failures)

Overall implant survival in autogenous bone grafts

No. of patients who had implants placed into autogenous bone grafts (and unsuccessful)

Overall patient implant success in autogenous bone grafts

No. of implants placed into autogenous bone grafts (and unsuccessful)

Overall implant success in autogenous bone grafts

Reasons for a lack of implant success

Studies with an average follow-up of 3 years or greater

Watzinger et al. [29]

1996

Vascularised iliac bone graft and non-vascularised iliac and rib bone graft

Yes—all patients had chemotherapy and RDX

Marginal bone loss, periodontal pocketing, gingival index and sulcus bleeding index showed wide variation

Not reported

N/A

52 (14)

73.1%*

Not reported

N/A

52 (22)

57.7%*

Non-functioning implants (not prosthetically loaded)

Teoh et al. [26]

2005

Vascularised fibula free flap

Yes—5 patients had chemotherapy, 1 patients had chemo/RDX (pre-implant placement), 6 patients had pre-op RDX and 1 patient had post-op RDX.

13 patients had soft tissue hyperplasia that need debulking or skin grafting

22 (2)

90.9%*

71 (3)

95.8%*

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Wu et al. [30]

2008

Fibula free flap

Yes—3 patients had RDX (unsure if pre or post-op)

Soft tissue hyperplasia needed surgical removal in 6 patients (17 implants).

29 (not reported)

N/A

100 (9)

91.0%

29 (not reported)

N/A

100 (14)

86.0%

Unfavourable local soft tissue and implant left as sleepers. Peri-implant bone loss greater than 2 mm

Fenlon et al. [19]

2012

Vascularised free flap—DCIA, radial, fibula and rib

Yes—35 implants had RDX

High rate of poor implant positioning in primary implant placement.

41 (10)

75.6%*

145 (18)

87.5%*

Not reported

N/A

145 (34)

76.6%*

Implants osseointegrated but prosthetically unusable

Ch’ng et al. [20]

2014

Vascularised fibula free flap

Yes −66/243 patients had RDX (43 patients pre-op RDX, 23 patients post-op RDX)

ORN 7.7% of all implants (19 patients, 4 cases in vascularised fibula free flap and 15 in native bone) smoking was shown to be a significant risk factors. Also modification of peri-implant soft tissue required such as debulking of soft tissue and vestibuloplasty as required.

54 (10)

81.5%*

243 (20)

91.8%

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Shaw et al. [31]

2005

Vascularised composite DCIA, fibula and radius and non-vascularised bone grafts

Yes—47% of patients had RDX

Soft tissue overgrowth in 3 patients (5 implants). Also, surgical debulk of soft tissue reported in number of cases.

33 (12)

63.6%*

123 (32)

69.0%

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Wang et al. [21]

2015

Vascularised fibula free flap (double barrel or vertical distraction osteogenesis techniques)

NO

Implant hygiene and bleeding increased over time. 6 patients (11 implants) required soft tissue reduction however recurrence of soft tissue overgrowth occurred.

19 (0)

100%

51 (0)

100%*

Not reported

N/A

51 (7)

86.3%*

Peri-implant bone loss greater than criteria (radiographic assessment)

Yerit et al. [16]

2006

Vascularised and non-vascularised iliac bone graft

No—No RDX to bone graft sites

None noted only documenting causes of implant loss

Not reported

N/A

78 (13)

54.0%

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Linsen et al. [17]

2009

Avascularised iliac bone graft

Yes—39 implants had RDX, 44 implants did not have RDX

Peri-implantitis in 12 patients (31 implants).

Not reported

N/A

79 (8)

89.9%*

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Studies with an average follow-up of less than 3 years or no average follow-up reported

Fierz et al. [25]

2013

Vascularised free flap—fibula, radius, scapula

Yes—20 out of 46 implants had RDX

Frail patients limited treatment, and prosthetic rehabilitation was challenging

Not reported

N/A

46 (8)

82.6%*

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Barrowman et al. [7]

2011

Vascularised free flap—illiac, DCIA and fibula and non-vascularised bone graft.

Yes—15 implants in to irradiated vascularised free flap

Inability of patients to tolerate prosthesis. Peri-implantitis and lack of integration of some implants.

Not reported

N/A

38 (5)

86.8%*

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Zou et al. [22]

2013

Vascularised iliac bone graft

No

Increase in plaque index over time. Prosthodontic complications overtime after prosthesis fitted also tumour recurrence

32 (not reported)

N/A

110 (4)

96.4%

Not reported

N/A

110 (9)

91.8%

Severe gingival hyperplasia and bone resorption in peri-implant area

Schultes et al. [15]

2002

Vascularised scapula and iliac bone graft

Yes—all patients had RDX 60 Gys.

Increased pocket depth around implants placed into non-native bone in comparison to native bone. 7 implants with pocketing greater than 5 mm were all in vascularised free flaps

38 (2)

94.7%*

96 (2)

97.9%*

Not reported

N/A

96 (4)

95.8%*

Implants inadequately positioned and could not be used for further prosthetic treatment

Buddula et al. [24]

2010

Bone graft—fibula, iliac and scapula (unsure of vascularised or non-vascularised)

Yes—all patients had RDX

None noted only documenting implant survival

Not reported

N/A

59 (8)

83.3%

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Klein et al. [32]

2009

Avascular iliac bone graft

Yes—some patients had RDX

None noted only documenting implant survival

Not reported

N/A

128 (22)

78.4%

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Burgess et al. [27]

2017

Vascularized bone grafts—fibula, DCIA, scapula and radial

Yes—some patients had RDX

None noted only documenting implant survival

59 (not reported)

N/A

199 (11)

93.6%

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

Chiapasco et al. [18]

2006

Vascularised fibula free flap

Yes—some patients had RDX and chemo—unknown number

Soft tissue overgrowth in 2 patients that required removal and palatal mucosal graft placed

14 (1)

92.9%*

62 (1)

98.3%*

14 (2)

85.7%*

62 (5)

91.9%*

Peri-implant bone loss greater than criteria (radiographic assessment)

Chiapasco et al. [23]

2008

Non-vascularised—Calvarium or iliac bone graft

Unknown

Soft tissue grafting required around implants in 3 patients

16 (1)

93.8%*

60 (2)

96.7%

16 (2)

87.5%*

60 (4)

93.3%

Peri-implant bone loss greater than criteria (radiographic assessment)

Chiapasco et al. [33]

2000

Non-vascularised—ilieum and fibula, and vascularised free flap—ilieum and fibula

Yes—3 patients had RDX (unknown if pre or post)

Soft tissue grafting required around implants in 3 patients

18 (2)

88.9%*

72 (3)

95.8%*

18 (2)

88.9%*

72 (3)

95.8%*

N/A

Hessling et al. [28]

2015

Free iliac crest, microvascular iliac, microvascular fibula, microvascular scapula, calavarial bone graft

Yes—some patients had RDX and chemo (pre- and post-op) unknown number

67% peri-implantitis due to a lack of attached gingivae

Not reported

N/A

93 (8)

91.4%*

Not reported

N/A

Not reported

N/A

N/A

  1. Implant survival and implant success in autogenous bone grafts was extracted on a patient and implant level (where applicable) for all 20 studies included within this review
  2. Those marked with an asterisk have had the survival/success percentages calculated by the authors due to their being adequate information/data within the studies to calculate this
  3. Abbreviations: RDX radiotherapy, chemo chemotherapy, DCIA deep circumflex iliac artery flap, pre-op pre-operative, post-op postoperative