Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 EDX

From: In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants

Element composition/semi-quantitative evaluation
Location Type Zr at %min–at %max Hf at % Y at %min–at %max Al at %min–at %max O at %min–at %max C at %min–at %max N at %min–at %max
Machined area WhiteSKY 16.0–19.5 < 0.25 1.47–1.67 < 0.5 55–58 17.6–24.0 < 1.0
Straumann ZLA 19.4–22.4 < 0.35 1.6–1.8 < 0.12 48.5–52.1 20.6–22.3 5.2–7.2
Vitaclinical 23.7 < 0.30 <  1.5 < 0.13 56 9.8 None
ZERAMEX 17.7 < 0.23 < Det. limit < 9.6 57.5 7.7 7.7
Monobloc M10 4.0–11.0 < 0.09 < Det. limit 0.4–2.3 12.0–21.0 63.0–80.0 0–11.0
Rough area WhiteSKY 15.6–19.3 < 0.23 0–2.8 1.1–3.8 49.8–80.7 0–20.7 0–6.3
Straumann ZLA 17.4–28.9 < 0.25 1.7–3.4 < 0.13 48.8–63.7 7.4–15.4 8.2–14.7
Vitaclinical 17.2–23.4 < 0.26 1.3–2.6 < 0.24 48.6–64.5 11.5–18.9 3.8–8.2
ZERAMEX 6.9–18.3 < 0.23 < 1.7 7.8–18.7 67.1–71.5 3.0–6.7 6.1–7.8
Monobloc M10 4.6–28.0 < 0.40 < Det. limit 2.9–13.9 12.0–69.0 28.0–79.0 None