Skip to main content

Table 2 EDX

From: In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants

Element composition/semi-quantitative evaluation

Location

Type

Zr at %min–at %max

Hf at %

Y at %min–at %max

Al at %min–at %max

O at %min–at %max

C at %min–at %max

N at %min–at %max

Machined area

WhiteSKY

16.0–19.5

< 0.25

1.47–1.67

< 0.5

55–58

17.6–24.0

< 1.0

Straumann ZLA

19.4–22.4

< 0.35

1.6–1.8

< 0.12

48.5–52.1

20.6–22.3

5.2–7.2

Vitaclinical

23.7

< 0.30

<  1.5

< 0.13

56

9.8

None

ZERAMEX

17.7

< 0.23

< Det. limit

< 9.6

57.5

7.7

7.7

Monobloc M10

4.0–11.0

< 0.09

< Det. limit

0.4–2.3

12.0–21.0

63.0–80.0

0–11.0

Rough area

WhiteSKY

15.6–19.3

< 0.23

0–2.8

1.1–3.8

49.8–80.7

0–20.7

0–6.3

Straumann ZLA

17.4–28.9

< 0.25

1.7–3.4

< 0.13

48.8–63.7

7.4–15.4

8.2–14.7

Vitaclinical

17.2–23.4

< 0.26

1.3–2.6

< 0.24

48.6–64.5

11.5–18.9

3.8–8.2

ZERAMEX

6.9–18.3

< 0.23

< 1.7

7.8–18.7

67.1–71.5

3.0–6.7

6.1–7.8

Monobloc M10

4.6–28.0

< 0.40

< Det. limit

2.9–13.9

12.0–69.0

28.0–79.0

None