Is antral membrane balloon elevation truly minimally invasive technique in sinus floor elevation surgery? A systematic review

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Table 2 Summary of the dental implants characteristics, survival rates, and failure rates with MIAMBE technique

Study	N of patients	Baseline bone height	Total N of implants	Implants survival rate %	N of failed implants	Implant failure rate %	Implant lengths	Implant diameters	Timing of failure	Follow-up period after operation
Kfir et al. [5]	12	3.7 ± 1.4 mm	Mean ± SD 2.08 ± 0.51	NM	1	NM	13, 17.1 mm	3.75, 5 mm	2 weeks after procedure	23 months
Kfir et al. [5]	12	3.5 ± 1.3 mm Mean = 3.5	Mean ± SD 1.91 ± 0.51	100	0	0	13, 17.1 mm	3.75, 5 mm		12 months
Kfir et al. [29]	36	3.4 ± 2.1 mm	72	97.2	2	2.77	13, 17.1 mm	3.75, 5 mm	1 and 3 weeks after procedure	6–8 months
Hu et al. [30]	28	4.92 ± 1.24 mm	26	96.15	1	3.84	NM	3.8, 5.0 mm	2 weeks after procedure	15.9 ± 2.94 months.
Kfir et al. [31]	112	3.8 ± 2.1 mm	219	95	11 FR = 5%	5	13, 17.1 mm	3.75, 5 mm	At 6 months after procedure	13 months
Mazor et al. [32]	20	2–6 mm	37	100	0	0	13 mm	5 mm		18 months
Petruzzi et al. [33]	40	8.00 ± 2.19 mm	56	100	0	0	11.5, 13, and 15 mm	4.00, 6.50 mm		1 year
Peñarrocha-Diago et al. [34]	6	2.1–4.1 mm	6	100	0	0	10, 11.5 mm	4.2, 5.2 mm		1 year (after prosthetic loading)
Gonzalez et al.[35]	14	5.2 mm	11	90	1	10	13 mm	NM	1 year	1 year
Dhandapani et al. [36]	9	5–8 mm	NM	NM	NM	NM	NM	NM	NM	6 months
Asmael and Lateef [37].	13	2.3–7.8 mm	23	91.30	2	8.70	10, 12 mm	4.2, 4.3, 4.8, and 5 mm	At 1 and 6 months	1 year

MIAMBE minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation, N number, NM not mentioned