Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics demonstrate patient characteristics and outcomes of MIAMBE technique in the selected studies

From: Is antral membrane balloon elevation truly minimally invasive technique in sinus floor elevation surgery? A systematic review

Study

Patients

Age

(years)

N of sinus augmentation

Sinus augmentation success rate %

Baseline bone height (mm)

Bone gain (mm)

Antral membrane elevation (mm)

Total bone height (mm)

Inflate balloon volume

Type of graft

Membrane perforation

Test for membrane perforation

Complications

Follow-up period after operation

N

M:F

R

M

N

PR %

Kfir et al. [5]

12

NM

42 ± 9

NM

91.6

3.7 ± 1.4

NM

> 10

10–17

≤ 2.5 mL

-PRF

-ABP

-Bi-Ostetic

synthetic

bone graft

1

8.33

Valsalva maneuver

Direct visualization

1 membrane tear

1 balloon rupture

1 implant failed

23 months

12

NM

NM

100

3.5 ± 1.3

NM

> 10

10–18

0

0

1 mild periprocedural nosebleed

12 months

Kfir et al. [29]

36

M = 18

F: 18

42 ± 9

36

97.2

3.4 ± 2.1

NM

> 10

8–18

NM

-PRF

-ABP

-Bi-Ostetic

Synthetic

bone graft

-Fisiograft

gel

1

2.77

Valsalva maneuver

1 membrane tear

2 implant failed

6–8 months

Hu et al. [30]

28

M = 143

F = 14

40.2 ± 12.35

28

92.85

4.92 ± 1.24

NM

Mean 10.9 ± 2.06

NM

0.67 ± 0.17 mL

-PRF

-Bio-Oss

2

7.14

Valsalva maneuver

1 mild nosebleed after surgery

2 membrane tear and the cases aborted

15.9 ± 2.94 months.

Kfir et al. [31]

112

M = 50

F = 62

44.1 ± 12.9

NM

97.3% initial procedural success 100% secondary procedural success

3.8 ± 2.1

NM

> 10

11–18

NM

-PRF

-Synthetic

bone graft

-ABP

-Fisiograft

gel

12

10.71

Valsalva maneuver

Direct visualization

1 infection and oroantral fistula at 4 weeks

3 membrane tear and the procedures aborted

9 micropuncture

13 months

Mazor et al. [32]

20

NM

37–72

24

100

2–6

NM

11

NM

NM

-PRF

-Synthetic

bone

substitute

0

0

Valsalva maneuver

Direct visualization

1 patient was allergic to the antibiotic

18 months

Petruzzi et al. [33]

40

M = 16

F = 24

41.5

NM

NM

8.00 ± 2.19

 

0.6

≤ 20

14.66 ± 1.48

1– ml

Calcium

sulphate

solution

3

7.5

Microscope (KarlKaps)

1 m acrolaceration

2 m icrolacerations

4 hemifacial edema

1 year

Peñarrocha-Diago et al. [34]

6

M = 5

27–51

6

83.3% for the all 6 cases 100% for the five cases

2.1–4.1

7.2–10.8

8.7

NM

11.3–14.5

NM

-ABP

-BIO-OSS

bovine bone

grafts

1

16.66

(Medi Pack Pal)

endoscope

1 membrane tear and case aborted

1 year after prosthetic loading

Gonzalez et al. [35]

14

M = 7

F = 7

NM

NM

71.4

5.2

 

8.5

NM

NM

NM

BIO-OSS

bovine bone

grafts

3

21.32

An operating microscope

Failure of four cases due to mucosa perforation (21.32%) and balloon breakage (7.14%).

1 implant showed marginal periimplantitis which treated successfully

1 year

Dhandapani et al. [36]

9

NM

25–60

10

100

5–8

3–5.5

4.34

≥ 10

13.5–9

1 cc

Irradiated

allogeneic

cancellous

bone and

marrow graft

0

0

NM

No complications

6 months

Asmael, and Lateef [37]

13

M = 4

F:9

28–57

17

100

2.3–7.8

4.9 –10.6

6.70

NM

9.8–17.2

0.5–1 cc

Particulate

bone grafts

(βTricalcium

Phosphate)

0

0

Direct

vi ion

Hydraulic pressure

1 mild nasal bleeding

1 infraorbital

ecchymosis

1 year

Total : Average

Total : Range

    

91.6

100–71.4%

 

6.968

3–10.8 mm

    

6.76

0–21.32%

   
  1. MIAMBE minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation, N number, NM not mentioned, M:F male: female numbers, M mean, R range, PRF platelets rich fibrin, PRP platelets rich plasma, ABP autogenous bone particles, PR perforation rate