Membrane perforation rate in lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation using conventional rotating instruments and piezoelectric device—a meta-analysis

Jordi, Corinne; Mukaddam, Khaled; Lambrecht, Jörg Thomas; Kühl, Sebastian

doi:10.1186/s40729-017-0114-2

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Table 2 Overview on the event rate (with lower and upper limits, z value), weight and significance (p values) for piezosurgical approach and random effect

From: Membrane perforation rate in lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation using conventional rotating instruments and piezoelectric device—a meta-analysis

Piezoelectric	Event rate	Lower limit	Upper limit	z value	p value	Weight
Wallace et al. 2007 [52]	0.005	0.000	0.074	− 3.741	0.000	1.660
Sohn et al. 2010 [53]	0.008	0.001	0.054	− 4.817	0.000	2.712
Toscano et al. 2010 [54]	0.009	0.001	0.125	− 3.328	0.001	1.655
He et al. 2013 [55]	0.010	0.001	0.143	− 3.218	0.001	1.653
Stübinger et al. 2008 [56]	0.019	0.001	0.244	− 2.753	0.006	1.642
Kim et al. 2012 [57]	0.028	0.015	0.052	− 11.010	0.000	6.342
Blus et al. 2008 [58]	0.038	0.009	0.139	− 4.493	0.000	3.924
Scarano et al. 2015 [43]	0.038	0.002	0.403	− 2.232	0.026	1.616
Penarrocha-Diago et al. 2012 [22]	0.040	0.006	0.235	− 3.114	0.002	2.656
Delibasi et al. 2013 [67]	0.043	0.006	0.252	− 3.023	0.003	2.649
Moon et al. 1 (Moon et al. 2015) [74]	0.045	0.003	0.448	− 2.103	0.035	1.607
Moon et al. 2 (Moon et al. 2015) [70]	0.045	0.003	0.448	− 2.103	0.035	1.607
Vercellotti et al. 2001 [8]	0.048	0.007	0.271	− 2.924	0.003	2.642
Cortes et al. 2012 [59]	0.050	0.013	0.179	− 4.059	0.000	3.900
Stacchi et al. 2013 [60]	0.056	0.021	0.139	− 5.507	0.000	5.118
Stübinger et al. 2009 [61]	0.063	0.009	0.335	− 2.622	0.009	2.615
Gemiani et al. 2015 [76]	0.093	0.047	0.175	− 6.134	0.000	6.030
Felice et al. 2013 [71]	0.100	0.025	0.324	− 2.948	0.003	3.799
Rickert et al. 2011 [73]	0.111	0.042	0.261	− 3.921	0.000	5.018
Rickert et al. 2013 [10]	0.111	0.042	0.261	− 3.921	0.000	5.018
Sánchez-Recio et al. 2010 [62]	0.154	0.059	0.345	− 3.136	0.002	4.936
Sohn et al. 2011 [72]	0.164	0.091	0.279	− 4.711	0.000	6.189
Barone et al. 2013 [63]	0.167	0.055	0.409	− 2.545	0.011	4.406
Cassetta et al. 2012 [75]	0.175	0.086	0.324	− 3.726	0.000	5.745
Weitz et al. 2014 [64]	0.175	0.086	0.324	− 3.726	0.000	5.745
Barone et al. 2008 [31]	0.308	0.120	0.591	− 1.349	0.177	4.590
Corinaldesi et al. 2013 [65]	0.333	0.131	0.624	− 1.132	0.258	4.522
Random	0.080	0.055	0.115	− 11.815	0.000

Back to article page