Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Overview on the event rate (with lower and upper limits, z value), weight and significance (p values) for piezosurgical approach and random effect

From: Membrane perforation rate in lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation using conventional rotating instruments and piezoelectric device—a meta-analysis

Piezoelectric Event rate Lower limit Upper limit z value p value Weight
Wallace et al. 2007 [52] 0.005 0.000 0.074 − 3.741 0.000 1.660
Sohn et al. 2010 [53] 0.008 0.001 0.054 − 4.817 0.000 2.712
Toscano et al. 2010 [54] 0.009 0.001 0.125 − 3.328 0.001 1.655
He et al. 2013 [55] 0.010 0.001 0.143 − 3.218 0.001 1.653
Stübinger et al. 2008 [56] 0.019 0.001 0.244 − 2.753 0.006 1.642
Kim et al. 2012 [57] 0.028 0.015 0.052 − 11.010 0.000 6.342
Blus et al. 2008 [58] 0.038 0.009 0.139 − 4.493 0.000 3.924
Scarano et al. 2015 [43] 0.038 0.002 0.403 − 2.232 0.026 1.616
Penarrocha-Diago et al. 2012 [22] 0.040 0.006 0.235 − 3.114 0.002 2.656
Delibasi et al. 2013 [67] 0.043 0.006 0.252 − 3.023 0.003 2.649
Moon et al. 1 (Moon et al. 2015) [74] 0.045 0.003 0.448 − 2.103 0.035 1.607
Moon et al. 2 (Moon et al. 2015) [70] 0.045 0.003 0.448 − 2.103 0.035 1.607
Vercellotti et al. 2001 [8] 0.048 0.007 0.271 − 2.924 0.003 2.642
Cortes et al. 2012 [59] 0.050 0.013 0.179 − 4.059 0.000 3.900
Stacchi et al. 2013 [60] 0.056 0.021 0.139 − 5.507 0.000 5.118
Stübinger et al. 2009 [61] 0.063 0.009 0.335 − 2.622 0.009 2.615
Gemiani et al. 2015 [76] 0.093 0.047 0.175 − 6.134 0.000 6.030
Felice et al. 2013 [71] 0.100 0.025 0.324 − 2.948 0.003 3.799
Rickert et al. 2011 [73] 0.111 0.042 0.261 − 3.921 0.000 5.018
Rickert et al. 2013 [10] 0.111 0.042 0.261 − 3.921 0.000 5.018
Sánchez-Recio et al. 2010 [62] 0.154 0.059 0.345 − 3.136 0.002 4.936
Sohn et al. 2011 [72] 0.164 0.091 0.279 − 4.711 0.000 6.189
Barone et al. 2013 [63] 0.167 0.055 0.409 − 2.545 0.011 4.406
Cassetta et al. 2012 [75] 0.175 0.086 0.324 − 3.726 0.000 5.745
Weitz et al. 2014 [64] 0.175 0.086 0.324 − 3.726 0.000 5.745
Barone et al. 2008 [31] 0.308 0.120 0.591 − 1.349 0.177 4.590
Corinaldesi et al. 2013 [65] 0.333 0.131 0.624 − 1.132 0.258 4.522
Random 0.080 0.055 0.115 − 11.815 0.000