Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk factors for peri-implantitis

From: Mucositis, peri-implantitis, and survival and success rates of oxide-coated implants in patients treated for periodontitis 3- to 6-year results of a case-series study

 

Peri-implantitis

n

Univariate analyses

Multivariate analyses

 

OR

(95% CI)

P

OR

(95% CI)

P

Subjects

 GAP

3

5

7.500

(0.931; 60.427)

0.054

  

n.s.

 GCP

4

24

  

 Female

4

18

0.762

(0.135; 4.301)

0.759

  

n.s.

 Male

3

11

  

Implants

        

 GAP

8

25

3.294

(1.186; 9.151)

0.027

2.596

(0.720; 9.352)

0.149

 GCP

13

104

 Female

9

76

0.459

(0.178; 1.184)

0.105

  

n.s.

 Male

12

53

Superstructure

       

 Single crown

7

56

0.881

(0.538; 1.442)

0.613

  

n.s.

 Fixed bridge

4

11

  

 Removable

10

62

  

Bone quality

       

 1

0

3

21.200

(3.915; 114.798)

0.000

30.896

(5.178; 0.868)

0.056

 2

16

118

 3

6

8

Degree of atrophy

       

 A

5

53

0.716

(0.404; 1.269)

0.252

  

n.s.

 B

10

41

  

 C

6

35

  

Topography

 Ant. maxilla

9

38

14.286

(1.849; 110.358)

0.000

15.680

(1.914; 128.455)

0.001

 Post. maxilla

11

45

 Ant. mandible

0

18

 Post. mandible

1

28

Implant length

 ≥ 10 mm

9

81

7.048

(1.563; 31.782)

0.002

9.555

(1.900; 48.051)

0.001

 < 10 mm

6

48

  1. Logistic regression analyses showed whether differences were significant (p ≤ 0.05)
  2. CI confidence interval, n.s. non-significant, OR odds ratio, p significance