Skip to main content

Table 2 Aesthetical Outcomes at T = 12 M (VAS Score)

From: Comparison of access-hole filling materials for screw retained implant prostheses: 12-month in vivo study

Patients Position
CR
  Patients Position
M4M
 
T = 0 T = 12 T = 0 T = 12
AMB 13 10 7 AMB 23 10 7
14 6 5 24 8 3
16 8 8 26 8 5
17 10 10 27 8 5
ROG 24 10 7 ROG 14 10 6
26 10 10 16 10 7
27 10 10 17 10 7
NEU 11 4 3 NEU 21 6 5
13 8 7 23 6 5
16 8 7 25 10 10
POU 36 10 9 POU 27 10 10
TRA 34 10 8 TRA 35 10 10
36 10 10 37 10 10
PHU 21 4 3 PHU 11 6 5
25 10 5 14 8 8
26 8 5 16 10 9
27 8 5 17 10 9
ORT 15 10 7 ORT 14 10 10
16 10 7
SUG 45 10 8 SUG 35 8 8
47 10 10 37 8 8
KAI 46 8 6    
FRA 45 8 8 FRA 25 10 10
46 10 10 26 8 8
47 10 10 27 6 6
SHI 37 6 4 SHI 16 8 6
HAS 35 10 10 HAS 45 10 10
36 8 8 46 8 8
37 8 8 47 8 8
Average 8.64 7.43 Average 8.71 7.50
SD 1.81 2.23 SD 1.46 2.00
  1. (T = 0)–(T = 12 M): CR 1.21 (SD = 1.37), M4M 1.21 (SD = 1.52) Mann-Whitney p > 0.05 (p = 0.848)
  2. 0: Filling completely dislodged
  3. 1: Filling partially dislodged
  4. 2: Access hole appearance and poor masking
  5. 3: 40% masking, with a marginal staining
  6. 4: 40% masking, no marginal staining
  7. 5: 60% masking, with a marginal staining
  8. 6: 60% masking, no marginal staining
  9. 7: 80% masking, with a marginal staining
  10. 8: 80% masking, no marginal staining
  11. 9: Total masking, with a marginal staining
  12. 10: Total masking, no marginal staining