Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of the question “Is there an additional clinical value of sFOV-CBCT?”

From: Evaluation of symptomatic maxillary sinus pathologies using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography—influence of professional training

Question

General practitioner (n = 2)

Junior maxillofacial surgeon (n = 2)

Senior maxillofacial surgeon (n = 3)

p value*

1 = it showed no additional information

2 (3.6%)

5 (8.9%)

15 (17.9%)

p < 0.001

2 = it was useful

16 (28.6%)

23 (41.1%)

23 (27.4%)

3 = it was affecting therapy

38 (67.8%)

28 (50.0%)

46 (54.8%)

  1. *One-way ANOVA test with post hoc Tukey B: GP versus MS1 p = 0.002, MS1 versus MS2 p = 0.890, and GP versus MS2 p = 0.001