Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of the question “Is there an additional clinical value of sFOV-CBCT?”

From: Evaluation of symptomatic maxillary sinus pathologies using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography—influence of professional training

Question General practitioner (n = 2) Junior maxillofacial surgeon (n = 2) Senior maxillofacial surgeon (n = 3) p value*
1 = it showed no additional information 2 (3.6%) 5 (8.9%) 15 (17.9%) p < 0.001
2 = it was useful 16 (28.6%) 23 (41.1%) 23 (27.4%)
3 = it was affecting therapy 38 (67.8%) 28 (50.0%) 46 (54.8%)
  1. *One-way ANOVA test with post hoc Tukey B: GP versus MS1 p = 0.002, MS1 versus MS2 p = 0.890, and GP versus MS2 p = 0.001