Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of the question “Based on PAN, the clinical area of interest, is…”

From: Evaluation of symptomatic maxillary sinus pathologies using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography—influence of professional training

Question

General practitioner (n = 2)

Junior maxillofacial surgeon (n = 2)

Senior maxillofacial surgeon (n = 3)

p value*

1 = good visibility and can be evaluated

3 (5.4%)

5 (8.9%)

13 (15.5%)

p < 0.002

2 = visible but cannot be evaluated

19 (33.9%)

22 (39.3%)

38 (45.2%)

3 = not visible

34 (60.7%)

29 (51.8%)

33 (39.3%)

  1. *One-way ANOVA test with post hoc Tukey B: GP versus MS1 p = 0.034, MS1 versus MS2 p = 0.211, and GP versus MS2 p = 0.001