Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of the question “Based on PAN, the clinical area of interest, is…”

From: Evaluation of symptomatic maxillary sinus pathologies using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography—influence of professional training

Question General practitioner (n = 2) Junior maxillofacial surgeon (n = 2) Senior maxillofacial surgeon (n = 3) p value*
1 = good visibility and can be evaluated 3 (5.4%) 5 (8.9%) 13 (15.5%) p < 0.002
2 = visible but cannot be evaluated 19 (33.9%) 22 (39.3%) 38 (45.2%)
3 = not visible 34 (60.7%) 29 (51.8%) 33 (39.3%)
  1. *One-way ANOVA test with post hoc Tukey B: GP versus MS1 p = 0.034, MS1 versus MS2 p = 0.211, and GP versus MS2 p = 0.001