Skip to main content

Table 4 Synopsis of included studies on tooth autotransplantation in order of publication year

From: Occlusal rehabilitation in patients with congenitally missing teeth—dental implants, conventional prosthetics, tooth autotransplants, and preservation of deciduous teeth—a systematic review

Author

Year

Study type

Population

Comparison

Patients

Transplants

Transplant survival [%]

Transplant success [%]

Pulp vitality [%]

Intact periodont. [%]

Follow-up [y]

Risk of bias

Kristersson [51]

1991

Retrosp.

Agen, incis, trauma

All

50

50

98

82

  

7.5

L

    

Immature

 

41

 

90

  

7.5

 
    

Mature

 

9

 

44

  

7.5

 

Kugelberg [52]

1994

Prosp.Ob

Ag, Tr

All

40

45

96

89

  

4

L

    

Immature

 

23

 

96

100

96

4

 
    

Mature

 

22

 

82

0

82

4

 

Marcusson [53]

1996

Prosp.Ob

Ag, missing

No

29

31

87

   

8

L

Josefsson [54]

1999

Retrosp.

Oligodontia

All

80

110

91

   

4

L

    

Immature

 

11

 

92

  

4

 
    

Mature

 

99

 

82

  

4

 

Czochrowska [55]

2002

Retrosp.

Agenesis

No

28

33

90

79

  

26.4

M

Bauss [23]

2004

Retrosp.

Ag, missing

All

88

91

100

84.6

  

4

M

    

OrthDerot

27

28

100

 

71.4

67.8

4

 
    

OrthExtru

20

21

100

 

90.5

85.7

4

 
    

NoOrthod

41

42

100

 

97.6

95.2

4

 

Jonsson [56]

2004

Prosp.Ob

Ag, missing

No

32

40

92.5

 

76

100

10

L

Tanaka [57]

2007

Retrosp.

Ag, missing

No

24

28

100

 

60.7

 

4

M

Mensink [58]

2010

Retrosp.

Ag, missing

No

44

63

100

 

89

 

1

L

Kvint [59]

2010

Retrosp.

Ag, missing

No

215

215

88.4

81

  

4.8

L

Bokelund [24]

2013

Retrosp.

Agenesis

All

157

211

100

   

10

L

    

Premolar

 

162

 

93

 

93

10

 
    

Molars

 

49

 

60

 

60

10

 
    

NormalPrim

 

71

 

95

 

95

10

 
    

InfraoccPrim

 

140

 

87

 

87

10