Skip to main content

Table 2 Aesthetical Outcomes at T = 12 M (VAS Score)

From: Comparison of access-hole filling materials for screw retained implant prostheses: 12-month in vivo study

Patients

Position

CR

 

Patients

Position

M4M

 

T = 0

T = 12

T = 0

T = 12

AMB

13

10

7

AMB

23

10

7

14

6

5

24

8

3

16

8

8

26

8

5

17

10

10

27

8

5

ROG

24

10

7

ROG

14

10

6

26

10

10

16

10

7

27

10

10

17

10

7

NEU

11

4

3

NEU

21

6

5

13

8

7

23

6

5

16

8

7

25

10

10

POU

36

10

9

POU

27

10

10

TRA

34

10

8

TRA

35

10

10

36

10

10

37

10

10

PHU

21

4

3

PHU

11

6

5

25

10

5

14

8

8

26

8

5

16

10

9

27

8

5

17

10

9

ORT

15

10

7

ORT

14

10

10

16

10

7

SUG

45

10

8

SUG

35

8

8

47

10

10

37

8

8

KAI

46

8

6

   

FRA

45

8

8

FRA

25

10

10

46

10

10

26

8

8

47

10

10

27

6

6

SHI

37

6

4

SHI

16

8

6

HAS

35

10

10

HAS

45

10

10

36

8

8

46

8

8

37

8

8

47

8

8

Average

8.64

7.43

Average

8.71

7.50

SD

1.81

2.23

SD

1.46

2.00

  1. (T = 0)–(T = 12 M): CR 1.21 (SD = 1.37), M4M 1.21 (SD = 1.52) Mann-Whitney p > 0.05 (p = 0.848)
  2. 0: Filling completely dislodged
  3. 1: Filling partially dislodged
  4. 2: Access hole appearance and poor masking
  5. 3: 40% masking, with a marginal staining
  6. 4: 40% masking, no marginal staining
  7. 5: 60% masking, with a marginal staining
  8. 6: 60% masking, no marginal staining
  9. 7: 80% masking, with a marginal staining
  10. 8: 80% masking, no marginal staining
  11. 9: Total masking, with a marginal staining
  12. 10: Total masking, no marginal staining